PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DWM vs. NTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DWM vs. NTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree International Equity Fund (DWM) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWM achieves a 8.10% return, which is significantly lower than NTSX's 9.50% return.


DWM

1D
0.62%
1M
1.69%
YTD
8.10%
6M
10.48%
1Y
21.18%
3Y*
18.36%
5Y*
9.75%
10Y*
8.49%

NTSX

1D
0.81%
1M
4.30%
YTD
9.50%
6M
8.89%
1Y
25.65%
3Y*
19.75%
5Y*
9.87%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DWM vs. NTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DWM
WisdomTree International Equity Fund
8.10%34.83%4.15%16.63%-9.04%10.76%-2.33%18.98%-11.78%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
9.50%18.82%20.20%22.70%-25.84%22.21%24.87%32.03%-8.72%

Correlation

The correlation between DWM and NTSX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2018

0.69

The correlation between DWM and NTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

DWM vs. NTSX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DWM
NTSX

Industrials

21.1%
7.7%

Financial Services

20.7%
12.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.4%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.6%
8.4%

Technology

8.2%
35.1%

Consumer Defensive

7.5%
5.5%

Communication Services

5.5%
12.5%

Utilities

5.5%
2.1%

Basic Materials

5.3%
1.4%

Energy

4.0%
3.5%

Real Estate

3.2%
1.5%

Industrials

DWM
21.1%
NTSX
7.7%

Financial Services

DWM
20.7%
NTSX
12.3%

Consumer Cyclical

DWM
10.4%
NTSX
10.1%

Healthcare

DWM
8.6%
NTSX
8.4%

Technology

DWM
8.2%
NTSX
35.1%

Consumer Defensive

DWM
7.5%
NTSX
5.5%

Communication Services

DWM
5.5%
NTSX
12.5%

Utilities

DWM
5.5%
NTSX
2.1%

Basic Materials

DWM
5.3%
NTSX
1.4%

Energy

DWM
4.0%
NTSX
3.5%

Real Estate

DWM
3.2%
NTSX
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DWM vs. NTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWM
DWM Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
DWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWM Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
DWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWM Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

NTSX
NTSX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
NTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWM vs. NTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International Equity Fund (DWM) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DWMNTSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.38

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

2.81

-0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.16

12.44

-5.29

DWM vs. NTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWM Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the NTSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWM and NTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DWMNTSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

2.09

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.58

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.72

-0.45

Drawdowns

DWM vs. NTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWM drawdown since its inception was -62.10%, which is greater than NTSX's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWM and NTSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DWMNTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.10%

-31.34%

-30.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.93%

-9.16%

-1.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.69%

-16.82%

+4.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.64%

-31.34%

+5.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.18%

-0.25%

-1.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.50%

-6.79%

-6.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

2.07%

+0.90%

Volatility

DWM vs. NTSX - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree International Equity Fund (DWM) has a higher volatility of 4.33% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) at 3.38%. This indicates that DWM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DWMNTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.33%

3.38%

+0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.83%

9.61%

+2.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.18%

12.32%

+1.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.28%

17.04%

-1.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.58%

18.27%

-1.69%

DWM vs. NTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWM has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSX's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

DWM vs. NTSX - Dividend Comparison

DWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, more than NTSX's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DWM
WisdomTree International Equity Fund
2.75%3.06%3.86%4.15%4.36%3.64%2.74%3.46%3.86%2.99%3.43%3.55%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
1.07%1.14%1.14%1.21%1.36%0.82%0.92%1.42%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DWM and NTSX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DWM has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to NTSX (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWM dropped -62.10% vs NTSX's -31.34%.

On 5-year performance, NTSX leads with 9.87% vs 9.75% for DWM. On fees, NTSX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, NTSX has been the lower-risk option at 3.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NTSX has performed better with a 9.87% return vs 9.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NTSX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for DWM.

DWM has the higher dividend yield at 2.75%, compared with 1.07% for NTSX.

DWM is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while NTSX is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for DWM and 0.20% for NTSX.

NTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DWM and NTSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer