DWAS vs. SOXQ
DWAS (Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF) and SOXQ (Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DWAS is a Momentum fund tracking the Dorsey Wright SmallCap Technical Leaders Index, while SOXQ is a Semiconductors fund tracking the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DWAS returned 15.80%/yr vs 58.65%/yr for SOXQ. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DWAS charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SOXQ.
Performance
DWAS vs. SOXQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DWAS achieves a 19.58% return, which is significantly lower than SOXQ's 93.97% return.
DWAS
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 19.58%
- 6M
- 22.17%
- 1Y
- 41.87%
- 3Y*
- 15.80%
- 5Y*
- 6.47%
- 10Y*
- 13.13%
SOXQ
- 1D
- 5.90%
- 1M
- 29.63%
- YTD
- 93.97%
- 6M
- 92.43%
- 1Y
- 185.41%
- 3Y*
- 58.65%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DWAS vs. SOXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWAS Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF | 19.58% | 6.09% | 9.81% | 16.88% | -18.51% | 1.81% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 93.97% | 43.11% | 20.16% | 66.74% | -35.59% | 24.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between DWAS and SOXQ is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021 | 0.65 |
The correlation between DWAS and SOXQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
DWAS vs. SOXQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DWAS
SOXQ
Healthcare
-
Technology
Industrials
-
Financial Services
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
DWAS
SOXQ
-
Technology
DWAS
SOXQ
Industrials
DWAS
SOXQ
-
Financial Services
DWAS
SOXQ
Energy
DWAS
SOXQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
DWAS
SOXQ
-
Basic Materials
DWAS
SOXQ
-
Consumer Defensive
DWAS
SOXQ
-
Real Estate
DWAS
SOXQ
-
Communication Services
DWAS
SOXQ
-
Utilities
DWAS
SOXQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DWAS vs. SOXQ — Risk / Return Rank
DWAS
SOXQ
DWAS vs. SOXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DWAS | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.85 | 5.53 | -3.68 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.53 | 5.28 | -2.75 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.73 | -0.43 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.24 | 12.19 | -7.94 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.89 | 46.84 | -32.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DWAS | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.85 | 5.53 | -3.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.97 | -0.48 |
Drawdowns
DWAS vs. SOXQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DWAS drawdown since its inception was -46.16%, roughly equal to the maximum SOXQ drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWAS and SOXQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DWAS | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.16% | -46.01% | -0.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.02% | -15.59% | +5.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.83% | -39.36% | +5.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.14% | 0.00% | -1.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.30% | -12.97% | +2.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.06% | 4.06% | -1.00% |
Volatility
DWAS vs. SOXQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) is 6.77%, while Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) has a volatility of 13.56%. This indicates that DWAS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DWAS | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.77% | 13.56% | -6.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.03% | 26.69% | -9.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.80% | 33.79% | -10.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.71% | 36.39% | -10.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.61% | 36.39% | -9.78% |
DWAS vs. SOXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
DWAS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXQ's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
DWAS vs. SOXQ - Dividend Comparison
DWAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than SOXQ's 0.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWAS Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF | 0.01% | 0.07% | 0.79% | 1.42% | 0.81% | 0.16% | 0.21% | 0.13% | 0.04% | 0.20% | 0.52% | 0.19% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 0.26% | 0.50% | 0.68% | 0.87% | 1.36% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DWAS and SOXQ have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXQ has higher volatility (13.56%) compared to DWAS (6.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWAS dropped -46.16% vs SOXQ's -46.01%.
On 3-year performance, SOXQ leads with 58.65% vs 15.80% for DWAS. On fees, SOXQ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, DWAS has been the lower-risk option at 6.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SOXQ has performed better with a 58.65% return vs 15.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXQ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DWAS.
SOXQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.26%, compared with 0.01% for DWAS.
DWAS is categorized as Momentum, while SOXQ is Semiconductors. DWAS tracks Dorsey Wright SmallCap Technical Leaders Index, while SOXQ tracks PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DWAS and 0.19% for SOXQ.
SOXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.53 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DWAS and SOXQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer