PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DVYA vs. MKOR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DVYA vs. MKOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA) and Matthews Korea Active ETF (MKOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DVYA achieves a 17.53% return, which is significantly lower than MKOR's 59.13% return.


DVYA

1D
-0.65%
1M
6.67%
6M
7.83%
YTD
17.53%
1Y
33.61%
3Y*
21.36%
5Y*
11.40%
10Y*
6.57%
ALL TIME*
5.46%

MKOR

1D
2.25%
1M
-10.44%
6M
28.23%
YTD
59.13%
1Y
108.28%
3Y*
32.37%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
30.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$231.55K$344.93K$287.92K
$731.81K$1.04M$1.49M

DVYA vs. MKOR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DVYA
iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF
17.53%30.22%6.05%9.73%
MKOR
Matthews Korea Active ETF
59.13%70.33%-15.76%-2.52%

Correlation

The correlation between DVYA and MKOR is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2023

0.51

The correlation between DVYA and MKOR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

DVYA vs. MKOR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DVYA
MKOR

Financial Services

34.1%
10.1%

Basic Materials

15.4%
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.9%
6.8%

Real Estate

9.6%

-

Industrials

6.3%
24.6%

Energy

5.0%
0.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
1.7%

Communication Services

4.3%
2.4%

Utilities

4.2%
0.6%

Healthcare

3.7%
1.6%

Technology

1.6%
51.5%

Financial Services

DVYA
34.1%
MKOR
10.1%

Basic Materials

DVYA
15.4%
MKOR
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

DVYA
10.9%
MKOR
6.8%

Real Estate

DVYA
9.6%
MKOR

-

Industrials

DVYA
6.3%
MKOR
24.6%

Energy

DVYA
5.0%
MKOR
0.7%

Consumer Defensive

DVYA
4.8%
MKOR
1.7%

Communication Services

DVYA
4.3%
MKOR
2.4%

Utilities

DVYA
4.2%
MKOR
0.6%

Healthcare

DVYA
3.7%
MKOR
1.6%

Technology

DVYA
1.6%
MKOR
51.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DVYA vs. MKOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DVYA
DVYA Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
DVYA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DVYA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
DVYA Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
DVYA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
DVYA Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

MKOR
MKOR Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
MKOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MKOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
MKOR Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
MKOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
MKOR Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DVYA vs. MKOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA) and Matthews Korea Active ETF (MKOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DVYAMKORDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.38

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.91

3.70

+0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.58

13.33

-1.75

DVYA vs. MKOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DVYA Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the MKOR Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DVYA and MKOR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DVYA vs. MKOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DVYA drawdown since its inception was -45.61%, which is greater than MKOR's maximum drawdown of -29.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVYA and MKOR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DVYAMKORDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.61%

-29.42%

-16.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.64%

-29.42%

+20.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.15%

-29.42%

+10.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.78%

-22.80%

+21.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.99%

-6.66%

-3.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

8.15%

-5.24%

Volatility

DVYA vs. MKOR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA) is 3.43%, while Matthews Korea Active ETF (MKOR) has a volatility of 16.59%. This indicates that DVYA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MKOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DVYAMKORDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.43%

16.59%

-13.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.62%

42.23%

-31.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.33%

45.23%

-31.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.15%

30.56%

-15.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.41%

30.56%

-13.15%

DVYA vs. MKOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DVYA has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than MKOR's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

DVYA vs. MKOR - Dividend Comparison

DVYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, more than MKOR's 1.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DVYA
iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF
4.41%4.71%5.97%6.48%7.29%5.81%3.66%5.52%6.24%4.74%4.79%5.33%
MKOR
Matthews Korea Active ETF
1.65%2.62%5.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DVYA and MKOR have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MKOR has higher volatility (16.59%) compared to DVYA (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DVYA dropped -45.61% vs MKOR's -29.42%.

On 3-year performance, MKOR leads with 32.37% vs 21.36% for DVYA. On fees, DVYA is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, DVYA has been the lower-risk option at 3.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, MKOR has performed better with a 32.37% return vs 21.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DVYA is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for MKOR.

DVYA has the higher dividend yield at 4.41%, compared with 1.65% for MKOR.

DVYA is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while MKOR is South Korea Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Matthews. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for DVYA and 0.79% for MKOR.

DVYA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DVYA and MKOR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer