DVXV vs. IHF
DVXV (WEBs Health Care XLV Defined Volatility ETF) and IHF (iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - DVXV tracks the Syntax Defined Volatility XLV Index while IHF tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Select Health Care Providers Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DVXV charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for IHF.
Performance
DVXV vs. IHF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DVXV achieves a -6.26% return, which is significantly lower than IHF's 4.65% return.
DVXV
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 2.40%
- YTD
- -6.26%
- 6M
- -6.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IHF
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 3.63%
- YTD
- 4.65%
- 6M
- 3.57%
- 1Y
- 6.61%
- 3Y*
- 0.41%
- 5Y*
- -0.52%
- 10Y*
- 8.04%
DVXV vs. IHF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DVXV WEBs Health Care XLV Defined Volatility ETF | -6.26% | 21.27% |
IHF iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF | 4.65% | 10.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between DVXV and IHF is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DVXV vs. IHF — Risk / Return Rank
DVXV
IHF
DVXV vs. IHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WEBs Health Care XLV Defined Volatility ETF (DVXV) and iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF (IHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DVXV | IHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.38 | +0.37 |
Drawdowns
DVXV vs. IHF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DVXV drawdown since its inception was -14.36%, smaller than the maximum IHF drawdown of -58.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVXV and IHF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DVXV | IHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.36% | -58.42% | +44.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -19.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.72% | -13.16% | +2.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.79% | -10.65% | +5.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.51% | — |
Volatility
DVXV vs. IHF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DVXV | IHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.30% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.82% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.33% | 21.51% | -0.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.33% | 19.10% | +2.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.33% | 21.00% | +0.33% |
DVXV vs. IHF - Expense Ratio Comparison
DVXV has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than IHF's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
DVXV vs. IHF - Dividend Comparison
DVXV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVXV WEBs Health Care XLV Defined Volatility ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IHF iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF | 1.07% | 1.05% | 0.86% | 0.79% | 0.74% | 0.56% | 0.53% | 0.58% | 4.01% | 0.19% | 0.25% | 0.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DVXV and IHF have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IHF is cheaper at 0.43% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IHF is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for DVXV.
IHF has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 0.00% for DVXV.
DVXV tracks Syntax Defined Volatility XLV Index, while IHF tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Health Care Providers Index. They also come from different issuers: WEBs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for DVXV and 0.43% for IHF.
Find the right allocation for DVXV and IHF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer