PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DVXV vs. IDNA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DVXV vs. IDNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WEBs Health Care XLV Defined Volatility ETF (DVXV) and iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare ETF Genomics Immunology and Healthcare Fund (IDNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DVXV achieves a -6.26% return, which is significantly lower than IDNA's 10.31% return.


DVXV

1D
1.22%
1M
2.40%
YTD
-6.26%
6M
-6.57%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IDNA

1D
0.73%
1M
-2.56%
YTD
10.31%
6M
8.52%
1Y
40.87%
3Y*
6.74%
5Y*
-8.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DVXV vs. IDNA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DVXV and IDNA is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025

0.59

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DVXV vs. IDNA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DVXV

IDNA
IDNA Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
IDNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDNA Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
IDNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDNA Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DVXV vs. IDNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WEBs Health Care XLV Defined Volatility ETF (DVXV) and iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare ETF Genomics Immunology and Healthcare Fund (IDNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DVXV vs. IDNA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DVXVIDNADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.10

+0.65

Drawdowns

DVXV vs. IDNA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DVXV drawdown since its inception was -14.36%, smaller than the maximum IDNA drawdown of -68.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVXV and IDNA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DVXVIDNADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.36%

-68.26%

+53.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.72%

-45.61%

+34.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.79%

-36.24%

+31.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.73%

Volatility

DVXV vs. IDNA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DVXVIDNADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.33%

24.48%

-3.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.33%

28.42%

-7.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.33%

29.53%

-8.20%

DVXV vs. IDNA - Expense Ratio Comparison

DVXV has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than IDNA's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

DVXV vs. IDNA - Dividend Comparison

DVXV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IDNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
DVXV
WEBs Health Care XLV Defined Volatility ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IDNA
iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare ETF Genomics Immunology and Healthcare Fund
1.07%1.18%0.98%1.04%0.54%0.70%0.26%0.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


DVXV and IDNA have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IDNA is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IDNA is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for DVXV.

IDNA has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 0.00% for DVXV.

DVXV tracks Syntax Defined Volatility XLV Index, while IDNA tracks NYSE FactSet Global Genomics and Immuno Biopharma Index. They also come from different issuers: WEBs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for DVXV and 0.47% for IDNA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DVXV and IDNA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer