DVXV vs. CNCR
DVXV (WEBs Health Care XLV Defined Volatility ETF) and CNCR (Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - DVXV tracks the Syntax Defined Volatility XLV Index while CNCR tracks the Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy Index. Both are passively managed. DVXV charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for CNCR.
Performance
DVXV vs. CNCR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DVXV
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 2.40%
- YTD
- -6.26%
- 6M
- -6.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CNCR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DVXV vs. CNCR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DVXV WEBs Health Care XLV Defined Volatility ETF | -8.74% |
CNCR Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DVXV vs. CNCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WEBs Health Care XLV Defined Volatility ETF (DVXV) and Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DVXV | CNCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | — | — |
Drawdowns
DVXV vs. CNCR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DVXV drawdown since its inception was -14.36%, which is greater than CNCR's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVXV and CNCR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DVXV | CNCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.36% | 0.00% | -14.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.72% | 0.00% | -10.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.79% | 0.00% | -4.79% |
Volatility
DVXV vs. CNCR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DVXV | CNCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.33% | 0.00% | +21.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.33% | 0.00% | +21.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.33% | 0.00% | +21.33% |
DVXV vs. CNCR - Expense Ratio Comparison
DVXV has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than CNCR's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
DVXV vs. CNCR - Dividend Comparison
Neither DVXV nor CNCR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, CNCR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CNCR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for DVXV.
DVXV and CNCR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
DVXV tracks Syntax Defined Volatility XLV Index, while CNCR tracks Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy Index. They also come from different issuers: WEBs and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for DVXV and 0.79% for CNCR.
Find the right allocation for DVXV and CNCR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer