DVXK vs. SMH
DVXK (WEBs Technology XLK Defined Volatility ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DVXK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Syntax Defined Volatility XLK Index, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DVXK charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
DVXK vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DVXK achieves a 42.75% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 77.13% return.
DVXK
- 1D
- -1.28%
- 1M
- 29.95%
- YTD
- 42.75%
- 6M
- 40.05%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMH
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 25.87%
- YTD
- 77.13%
- 6M
- 75.61%
- 1Y
- 157.20%
- 3Y*
- 64.17%
- 5Y*
- 39.21%
- 10Y*
- 37.68%
DVXK vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DVXK WEBs Technology XLK Defined Volatility ETF | 42.75% | 15.77% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 77.13% | 26.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between DVXK and SMH is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.86 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DVXK vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
DVXK
SMH
DVXK vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WEBs Technology XLK Defined Volatility ETF (DVXK) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DVXK | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 5.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.46 | 0.34 | +2.12 |
Drawdowns
DVXK vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DVXK drawdown since its inception was -24.08%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVXK and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DVXK | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.08% | -84.96% | +60.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.28% | 0.00% | -1.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.71% | -41.09% | +34.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.89% | — |
Volatility
DVXK vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DVXK | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.47% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 24.29% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.24% | 30.56% | +1.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.24% | 35.01% | -2.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.24% | 32.57% | -0.33% |
DVXK vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
DVXK has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
DVXK vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
DVXK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, more than SMH's 0.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVXK WEBs Technology XLK Defined Volatility ETF | 2.32% | 3.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DVXK and SMH have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for DVXK.
DVXK has the higher dividend yield at 2.32%, compared with 0.17% for SMH.
DVXK is categorized as Technology Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. DVXK tracks Syntax Defined Volatility XLK Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: WEBs and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for DVXK and 0.35% for SMH.
Find the right allocation for DVXK and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer