DVXB vs. PSCM
DVXB (WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF) and PSCM (Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF) are both Materials funds - DVXB tracks the Syntax Defined Volatility XLB Index while PSCM tracks the S&P Small Cap 600 / Materials -SEC. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DVXB charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for PSCM.
Performance
DVXB vs. PSCM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DVXB achieves a 20.01% return, which is significantly lower than PSCM's 26.28% return.
DVXB
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 1.55%
- YTD
- 20.01%
- 6M
- 24.08%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSCM
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- -0.62%
- YTD
- 26.28%
- 6M
- 30.79%
- 1Y
- 62.19%
- 3Y*
- 18.02%
- 5Y*
- 10.07%
- 10Y*
- 12.90%
DVXB vs. PSCM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DVXB WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF | 20.01% | -6.27% |
PSCM Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF | 26.28% | 9.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between DVXB and PSCM is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DVXB vs. PSCM — Risk / Return Rank
DVXB
PSCM
DVXB vs. PSCM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF (DVXB) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF (PSCM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DVXB | PSCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.39 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
DVXB vs. PSCM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DVXB drawdown since its inception was -19.77%, smaller than the maximum PSCM drawdown of -51.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVXB and PSCM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DVXB | PSCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.77% | -51.34% | +31.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.33% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -51.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.08% | -2.73% | -6.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.93% | -10.90% | +3.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.78% | — |
Volatility
DVXB vs. PSCM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DVXB | PSCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.72% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.84% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.44% | 24.03% | +6.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.44% | 25.74% | +4.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.44% | 26.91% | +3.53% |
DVXB vs. PSCM - Expense Ratio Comparison
DVXB has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than PSCM's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
DVXB vs. PSCM - Dividend Comparison
DVXB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PSCM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVXB WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSCM Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF | 1.02% | 1.17% | 0.80% | 0.81% | 0.93% | 0.67% | 1.56% | 1.14% | 1.25% | 0.61% | 0.76% | 1.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DVXB and PSCM have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PSCM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PSCM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for DVXB.
PSCM has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.00% for DVXB.
DVXB tracks Syntax Defined Volatility XLB Index, while PSCM tracks S&P Small Cap 600 / Materials -SEC. They also come from different issuers: WEBs and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for DVXB and 0.29% for PSCM.
Find the right allocation for DVXB and PSCM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer