DVUT vs. FPWR
DVUT (WEBs Utilities XLU Defined Volatility ETF) and FPWR (First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF) are both Utilities Equities funds. DVUT is passively managed, while FPWR is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DVUT charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for FPWR.
Performance
DVUT vs. FPWR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DVUT achieves a 7.47% return, which is significantly lower than FPWR's 14.10% return.
DVUT
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- -0.99%
- YTD
- 7.47%
- 6M
- 7.72%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FPWR
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- -0.82%
- YTD
- 14.10%
- 6M
- 14.06%
- 1Y
- 20.93%
- 3Y*
- 18.24%
- 5Y*
- 12.46%
- 10Y*
- —
DVUT vs. FPWR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DVUT WEBs Utilities XLU Defined Volatility ETF | 7.47% | 2.12% |
FPWR First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF | 14.10% | 2.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between DVUT and FPWR is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 0.86 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DVUT vs. FPWR — Risk / Return Rank
DVUT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FPWR
DVUT vs. FPWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WEBs Utilities XLU Defined Volatility ETF (DVUT) and First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF (FPWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DVUT | FPWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.35 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.19 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.54 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DVUT vs. FPWR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DVUT drawdown since its inception was -18.27%, smaller than the maximum FPWR drawdown of -32.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVUT and FPWR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DVUT | FPWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.27% | -32.28% | +14.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.07% | -1.98% | -8.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.86% | -4.98% | -2.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.99% | — |
Volatility
DVUT vs. FPWR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DVUT | FPWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.60% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.20% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.24% | 10.57% | +15.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.24% | 14.21% | +12.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.24% | 17.36% | +8.88% |
DVUT vs. FPWR - Expense Ratio Comparison
DVUT has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than FPWR's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
DVUT vs. FPWR - Dividend Comparison
DVUT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FPWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVUT WEBs Utilities XLU Defined Volatility ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FPWR First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF | 1.80% | 1.97% | 2.52% | 2.54% | 1.72% | 1.66% | 1.68% | 0.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DVUT and FPWR have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DVUT is cheaper at 0.89% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DVUT is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for FPWR.
FPWR has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 0.00% for DVUT.
They also come from different issuers: WEBs and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for DVUT and 0.96% for FPWR.
Find the right allocation for DVUT and FPWR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer