PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DVUT vs. DVXB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DVUT vs. DVXB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WEBs Utilities XLU Defined Volatility ETF (DVUT) and WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF (DVXB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DVUT achieves a 4.94% return, which is significantly lower than DVXB's 15.12% return.


DVUT

1D
-0.88%
1M
-4.44%
6M
3.42%
YTD
4.94%
1Y
3.76%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.01%

DVXB

1D
-3.82%
1M
-4.08%
6M
-0.84%
YTD
15.12%
1Y
20.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$336.61$333.66$2.68K
$1.05K$1.06K$4.38K

DVUT vs. DVXB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DVUT and DVXB is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DVUT vs. DVXB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DVUT
DVUT Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
DVUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DVUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
DVUT Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
DVUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
DVUT Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

DVXB
DVXB Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
DVXB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DVXB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
DVXB Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
DVXB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
DVXB Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DVUT vs. DVXB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WEBs Utilities XLU Defined Volatility ETF (DVUT) and WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF (DVXB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DVUTDVXBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.12

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.23

0.91

-0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.45

2.08

-1.63

DVUT vs. DVXB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DVUT Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the DVXB Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DVUT and DVXB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DVUT vs. DVXB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DVUT drawdown since its inception was -18.27%, smaller than the maximum DVXB drawdown of -19.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVUT and DVXB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DVUTDVXBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.27%

-19.77%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.27%

-19.77%

+1.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.19%

-12.78%

+0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.98%

-7.54%

-0.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.37%

8.63%

+0.74%

Volatility

DVUT vs. DVXB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WEBs Utilities XLU Defined Volatility ETF (DVUT) is 7.37%, while WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF (DVXB) has a volatility of 8.95%. This indicates that DVUT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DVXB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DVUTDVXBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.37%

8.95%

-1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.50%

22.87%

-3.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.12%

30.49%

-4.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.08%

30.60%

-4.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.08%

30.60%

-4.52%

DVUT vs. DVXB - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DVUT and DVXB have an expense ratio of 0.89%.


Dividends

DVUT vs. DVXB - Dividend Comparison

Neither DVUT nor DVXB has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DVUT and DVXB have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DVXB has higher volatility (8.95%) compared to DVUT (7.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DVUT dropped -18.27% vs DVXB's -19.77%.

On 1-year performance, DVXB leads with 20.35% vs 3.76% for DVUT. Both ETFs have the same 0.89% expense ratio. On volatility, DVUT has been the lower-risk option at 7.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DVXB has performed better with a 20.35% return vs 3.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DVUT and DVXB have the same expense ratio: 0.89% per year.

DVUT and DVXB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

DVUT is categorized as Utilities Equities, while DVXB is Materials. DVUT tracks Syntax Defined Volatility XLU Index, while DVXB tracks Syntax Defined Volatility XLB Index.

DVXB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.59 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DVUT and DVXB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer