DVQQ vs. DGRO
DVQQ (WEBs QQQ Defined Volatility ETF) and DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - DVQQ tracks the Syntax Defined Volatility Triple Qs Index while DGRO tracks the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, DVQQ returned 48.51% vs 23.89% for DGRO. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DVQQ charges 0.94%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for DGRO.
Performance
DVQQ vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DVQQ achieves a 20.55% return, which is significantly higher than DGRO's 9.64% return.
DVQQ
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 11.94%
- YTD
- 20.55%
- 6M
- 17.68%
- 1Y
- 48.51%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DGRO
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 3.27%
- YTD
- 9.64%
- 6M
- 9.87%
- 1Y
- 23.89%
- 3Y*
- 17.46%
- 5Y*
- 10.72%
- 10Y*
- 13.34%
DVQQ vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DVQQ WEBs QQQ Defined Volatility ETF | 20.55% | 18.03% | -7.61% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 9.64% | 15.69% | -1.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between DVQQ and DGRO is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2024 | 0.53 |
The correlation between DVQQ and DGRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DVQQ vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank
DVQQ
DGRO
DVQQ vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WEBs QQQ Defined Volatility ETF (DVQQ) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DVQQ | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.46 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.73 | 3.71 | -0.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.96 | 14.33 | -5.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DVQQ | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.13 | 2.53 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.77 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
DVQQ vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DVQQ drawdown since its inception was -25.09%, smaller than the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVQQ and DGRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DVQQ | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.09% | -35.10% | +10.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.89% | -6.47% | -11.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | 0.00% | -1.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.14% | -3.44% | -3.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.43% | 1.67% | +3.76% |
Volatility
DVQQ vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison
WEBs QQQ Defined Volatility ETF (DVQQ) has a higher volatility of 6.30% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.24%. This indicates that DVQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DVQQ | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.30% | 2.24% | +4.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.08% | 6.94% | +9.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.86% | 9.49% | +13.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.34% | 13.82% | +10.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.34% | 16.62% | +7.72% |
DVQQ vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
DVQQ has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
DVQQ vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison
DVQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than DGRO's 1.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.94% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
DVQQ WEBs QQQ Defined Volatility ETF | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DVQQ and DGRO have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DVQQ has higher volatility (6.30%) compared to DGRO (2.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DVQQ dropped -25.09% vs DGRO's -35.10%.
On 1-year performance, DVQQ leads with 48.51% vs 23.89% for DGRO. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DVQQ has performed better with a 48.51% return vs 23.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.94% for DVQQ.
DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 0.03% for DVQQ.
DVQQ tracks Syntax Defined Volatility Triple Qs Index, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: WEBs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.94% for DVQQ and 0.08% for DGRO.
DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DVQQ and DGRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer