PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DVQQ vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DVQQ vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WEBs QQQ Defined Volatility ETF (DVQQ) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DVQQ achieves a 15.66% return, which is significantly higher than DGRO's 12.23% return.


DVQQ

1D
0.24%
1M
0.54%
6M
11.92%
YTD
15.66%
1Y
32.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DGRO

1D
0.19%
1M
2.16%
6M
9.63%
YTD
12.23%
1Y
21.63%
3Y*
16.92%
5Y*
11.06%
10Y*
13.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DVQQ vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
DVQQ
WEBs QQQ Defined Volatility ETF
15.66%18.03%-7.84%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
12.23%15.69%-2.41%

Correlation

The correlation between DVQQ and DGRO is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2024

0.49

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DVQQ vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DVQQ
DVQQ Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
DVQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DVQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
DVQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
DVQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
DVQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DVQQ vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WEBs QQQ Defined Volatility ETF (DVQQ) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DVQQDGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.42

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

3.36

-1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.56

12.98

-7.42

DVQQ vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DVQQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DVQQ and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DVQQ vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DVQQ drawdown since its inception was -25.28%, smaller than the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVQQ and DGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DVQQDGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.28%

-35.10%

+9.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.89%

-6.47%

-11.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.07%

-0.50%

-4.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.13%

-3.42%

-3.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.71%

1.67%

+4.04%

Volatility

DVQQ vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

WEBs QQQ Defined Volatility ETF (DVQQ) has a higher volatility of 6.53% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.52%. This indicates that DVQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DVQQDGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.53%

2.52%

+4.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.94%

6.94%

+11.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.91%

9.50%

+14.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.73%

13.79%

+10.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.73%

16.57%

+8.16%

DVQQ vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DVQQ has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

DVQQ vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

DVQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than DGRO's 1.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.91%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
DVQQ
WEBs QQQ Defined Volatility ETF
0.03%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DVQQ and DGRO have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DVQQ has higher volatility (6.53%) compared to DGRO (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DVQQ dropped -25.28% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

On 1-year performance, DVQQ leads with 32.28% vs 21.63% for DGRO. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DVQQ has performed better with a 32.28% return vs 21.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.94% for DVQQ.

DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 0.03% for DVQQ.

DVQQ tracks Syntax Defined Volatility Triple Qs Index, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: WEBs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.94% for DVQQ and 0.08% for DGRO.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DVQQ and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer