PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DVND vs. RBIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DVND vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Touchstone Dividend Select ETF (DVND) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DVND achieves a 10.56% return, which is significantly higher than RBIL's 2.67% return.


DVND

1D
0.43%
1M
3.87%
YTD
10.56%
6M
11.03%
1Y
24.15%
3Y*
16.99%
5Y*
10Y*

RBIL

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.34%
YTD
2.67%
6M
2.74%
1Y
4.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DVND vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DVND and RBIL is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2025

-0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DVND vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DVND
DVND Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
DVND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DVND Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
DVND Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
DVND Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
DVND Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

RBIL
RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DVND vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone Dividend Select ETF (DVND) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DVNDRBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

2.41

-0.96

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.11

17.11

-14.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.77

71.11

-59.35

DVND vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DVND Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is lower than the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 5.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DVND and RBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DVNDRBILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

5.06

-2.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.06

4.24

-3.18

Drawdowns

DVND vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DVND drawdown since its inception was -14.83%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVND and RBIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DVNDRBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.83%

-0.50%

-14.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.80%

-0.27%

-7.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.03%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.45%

-0.06%

-2.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

0.06%

+2.00%

Volatility

DVND vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

Touchstone Dividend Select ETF (DVND) has a higher volatility of 2.50% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.30%. This indicates that DVND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DVNDRBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.50%

0.30%

+2.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.33%

0.79%

+6.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.82%

0.92%

+8.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.36%

1.05%

+12.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.36%

1.05%

+12.31%

DVND vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DVND has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

DVND vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

DVND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, less than RBIL's 4.60% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
DVND
Touchstone Dividend Select ETF
1.80%1.93%2.06%2.05%0.71%
RBIL
F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF
4.60%3.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DVND and RBIL have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DVND has higher volatility (2.50%) compared to RBIL (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DVND dropped -14.83% vs RBIL's -0.50%.

On 1-year performance, DVND leads with 24.15% vs 4.60% for RBIL. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DVND has performed better with a 24.15% return vs 4.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for DVND.

RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.60%, compared with 1.80% for DVND.

DVND is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Touchstone and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for DVND and 0.17% for RBIL.

RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.06 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DVND and RBIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer