DVN vs. QQQM
DVN (Devon Energy Corporation) is a stock, while QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past 5 years, DVN returned 14.12%/yr vs 16.94%/yr for QQQM. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DVN vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DVN achieves a 24.34% return, which is significantly higher than QQQM's 17.59% return.
DVN
- 1D
- 1.57%
- 1M
- -3.39%
- YTD
- 24.34%
- 6M
- 22.17%
- 1Y
- 35.40%
- 3Y*
- -0.45%
- 5Y*
- 14.12%
- 10Y*
- 6.14%
QQQM
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 17.59%
- 6M
- 17.91%
- 1Y
- 37.64%
- 3Y*
- 26.52%
- 5Y*
- 16.94%
- 10Y*
- —
DVN vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVN Devon Energy Corporation | 24.34% | 15.03% | -25.21% | -23.08% | 50.86% | 199.88% | 61.48% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 17.59% | 20.85% | 25.68% | 55.01% | -32.52% | 27.45% | 6.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between DVN and QQQM is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2020 | 0.16 |
The correlation between DVN and QQQM shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.17 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DVN vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank
DVN
QQQM
DVN vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Devon Energy Corporation (DVN) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DVN | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.37 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | 3.02 | -0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.17 | 11.23 | -6.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DVN vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DVN drawdown since its inception was -94.93%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVN and QQQM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DVN | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.93% | -35.04% | -59.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.36% | -11.96% | -3.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.22% | -22.70% | -26.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.45% | -35.04% | -26.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -88.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.02% | -3.33% | -38.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.93% | -8.23% | -27.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.86% | 3.21% | +3.65% |
Volatility
DVN vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison
Devon Energy Corporation (DVN) has a higher volatility of 12.66% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 7.45%. This indicates that DVN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DVN | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.66% | 7.45% | +5.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.63% | 13.71% | +12.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.17% | 17.11% | +17.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.13% | 22.40% | +18.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.62% | 22.22% | +27.40% |
Dividends
DVN vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison
DVN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, more than QQQM's 0.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVN Devon Energy Corporation | 1.59% | 2.62% | 4.43% | 4.55% | 8.41% | 5.24% | 4.30% | 1.35% | 1.33% | 0.58% | 0.92% | 3.00% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.43% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DVN and QQQM have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DVN has higher volatility (12.66%) compared to QQQM (7.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DVN dropped -94.93% vs QQQM's -35.04%.
QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DVN and QQQM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer