DVGR vs. IWX
DVGR (DAC 3D Dividend Growth ETF) and IWX (iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. DVGR is actively managed, while IWX is passively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DVGR charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for IWX.
Performance
DVGR vs. IWX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DVGR achieves a 6.73% return, which is significantly lower than IWX's 18.09% return.
DVGR
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- 6M
- 3.20%
- YTD
- 6.73%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWX
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 3.46%
- 6M
- 14.50%
- YTD
- 18.09%
- 1Y
- 29.24%
- 3Y*
- 19.16%
- 5Y*
- 12.18%
- 10Y*
- 11.75%
DVGR vs. IWX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DVGR DAC 3D Dividend Growth ETF | 6.73% | -0.69% |
IWX iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF | 18.09% | 0.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between DVGR and IWX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2025 | 0.74 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DVGR vs. IWX — Risk / Return Rank
DVGR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IWX
DVGR vs. IWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DAC 3D Dividend Growth ETF (DVGR) and iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF (IWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DVGR | IWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.49 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.38 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 18.71 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DVGR vs. IWX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DVGR drawdown since its inception was -8.19%, smaller than the maximum IWX drawdown of -35.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVGR and IWX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DVGR | IWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.19% | -35.76% | +27.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.37% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.19% | -0.43% | -1.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.90% | -3.80% | +1.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.54% | — |
Volatility
DVGR vs. IWX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DVGR | IWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.03% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.41% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.06% | 10.69% | +2.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.06% | 13.90% | -0.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.06% | 16.47% | -3.41% |
DVGR vs. IWX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DVGR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than IWX's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
DVGR vs. IWX - Dividend Comparison
DVGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than IWX's 1.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVGR DAC 3D Dividend Growth ETF | 0.61% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWX iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF | 1.42% | 1.59% | 1.97% | 2.13% | 2.07% | 1.79% | 2.12% | 2.60% | 2.66% | 2.12% | 2.22% | 2.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DVGR and IWX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IWX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IWX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DVGR.
IWX has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.61% for DVGR.
They also come from different issuers: Dividend Assets Capital and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DVGR and 0.20% for IWX.
Find the right allocation for DVGR and IWX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer