DVGR vs. FUNL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DVGR (DAC 3D Dividend Growth ETF) and FUNL (CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DVGR charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FUNL.

Performance

DVGR vs. FUNL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DAC 3D Dividend Growth ETF (DVGR) and CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DVGR achieves a 8.13% return, which is significantly higher than FUNL's 5.66% return.

DVGR

• 1D: -0.65%
• 1M: 1.89%
• YTD: 8.13%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FUNL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 5.66%
• 6M: 7.22%
• 1Y: 18.97%
• 3Y*: 16.53%
• 5Y*: 9.42%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DVGR vs. FUNL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DVGR DAC 3D Dividend Growth ETF	8.13%	-0.65%
FUNL CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL	5.66%	1.22%

Correlation

The correlation between DVGR and FUNL is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2025	0.48

Return for Risk

DVGR vs. FUNL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUNL

FUNL Risk / Return Rank: 80
FUNL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
FUNL Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
FUNL Omega Ratio Rank: 79
FUNL Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
FUNL Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DVGR vs. FUNL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DAC 3D Dividend Growth ETF (DVGR) and CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DVGR	FUNL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.19	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.63	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.20	0.95	+0.25

Drawdowns

DVGR vs. FUNL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DVGR drawdown since its inception was -8.19%, smaller than the maximum FUNL drawdown of -19.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVGR and FUNL.

Drawdown Indicators

	DVGR	FUNL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.19%	-19.35%	+11.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.83%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.37%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.65%	-0.12%	-0.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.82%	-3.54%	+1.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.82%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DVGR	FUNL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.00%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	5.24%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.39%	8.82%	+4.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.39%	15.16%	-1.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.39%	15.29%	-1.90%

DVGR vs. FUNL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DVGR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FUNL's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

DVGR vs. FUNL - Dividend Comparison

DVGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than FUNL's 2.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DVGR DAC 3D Dividend Growth ETF	0.49%	0.05%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FUNL CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL	2.25%	2.10%	1.78%	1.69%	1.84%	1.55%	0.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DVGR and FUNL in my portfolio?

DVGR and FUNL have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DVGR or FUNL?

On fees, FUNL is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DVGR or FUNL?

FUNL is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DVGR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DVGR or FUNL?

FUNL has the higher dividend yield at 2.25%, compared with 0.49% for DVGR.

What is the main difference between DVGR and FUNL?

They also come from different issuers: Dividend Assets Capital and CornerCap. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DVGR and 0.50% for FUNL.