DVDN vs. DIVB

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

DVDN (Kingsbarn Dividend Opportunity ETF) and DIVB (iShares Core Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DVDN is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Kingsbarn, while DIVB is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend and Buyback Index. DVDN is actively managed, while DIVB is passively managed. Over the past year, DVDN returned -18.23% vs 30.52% for DIVB. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DVDN charges 1.72%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for DIVB.

Performance

DVDN vs. DIVB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kingsbarn Dividend Opportunity ETF (DVDN) and iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DVDN achieves a -8.25% return, which is significantly lower than DIVB's 22.13% return.

DVDN

• 1D: 1.35%
• 1M: 0.83%
• 6M: -11.96%
• YTD: -8.25%
• 1Y: -18.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DIVB

• 1D: 2.12%
• 1M: 3.84%
• 6M: 18.62%
• YTD: 22.13%
• 1Y: 30.52%
• 3Y*: 21.77%
• 5Y*: 13.09%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DVDN vs. DIVB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DVDN Kingsbarn Dividend Opportunity ETF	-8.25%	-17.23%	2.17%	16.65%
DIVB iShares Core Dividend ETF	22.13%	15.09%	18.59%	14.17%

Correlation

The correlation between DVDN and DIVB is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2023	0.60

The correlation between DVDN and DIVB shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

DVDN vs. DIVB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DVDN

DVDN Risk / Return Rank: 3
DVDN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
DVDN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
DVDN Omega Ratio Rank: 2
DVDN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
DVDN Martin Ratio Rank: 3

DIVB

DIVB Risk / Return Rank: 90
DIVB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
DIVB Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
DIVB Omega Ratio Rank: 89
DIVB Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
DIVB Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DVDN vs. DIVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kingsbarn Dividend Opportunity ETF (DVDN) and iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DVDN	DIVB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.03	2.52	-3.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.37	3.53	-4.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.84	1.45	-0.61
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.72	4.49	-5.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.20	15.05	-16.25

DVDN vs. DIVB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DVDN Sharpe Ratio is -1.03, which is lower than the DIVB Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DVDN and DIVB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DVDN vs. DIVB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DVDN drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, smaller than the maximum DIVB drawdown of -36.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVDN and DIVB.

Drawdown Indicators

	DVDN	DIVB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.59%	-36.93%	+2.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.34%	-6.82%	-18.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.45%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-30.63%	0.00%	-30.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.46%	-4.94%	-8.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.27%	2.03%	+13.24%

Volatility

DVDN vs. DIVB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Kingsbarn Dividend Opportunity ETF (DVDN) is 3.98%, while iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB) has a volatility of 4.76%. This indicates that DVDN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIVB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DVDN	DIVB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.98%	4.76%	-0.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.66%	9.50%	+5.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.85%	12.16%	+5.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.68%	15.35%	+3.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.68%	18.35%	+0.33%

DVDN vs. DIVB - Expense Ratio Comparison

DVDN has a 1.72% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVB's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

DVDN vs. DIVB - Dividend Comparison

DVDN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.67%, more than DIVB's 2.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DIVB iShares Core Dividend ETF	2.17%	2.50%	2.61%	3.18%	2.02%	1.63%	2.08%	2.07%	2.52%	0.37%
DVDN Kingsbarn Dividend Opportunity ETF	14.67%	17.27%	14.43%	2.74%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DVDN and DIVB in my portfolio?

DVDN and DIVB have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DVDN or DIVB?

DIVB has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to DVDN (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DVDN dropped -34.59% vs DIVB's -36.93%.

Which ETF is better, DVDN or DIVB?

On 1-year performance, DIVB leads with 30.52% vs -18.23% for DVDN. On fees, DIVB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, DVDN has been the lower-risk option at 3.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DVDN or DIVB?

Over the 1-year period, DIVB has performed better with a 30.52% return vs -18.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DVDN or DIVB?

DIVB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.72% for DVDN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DVDN or DIVB?

DVDN has the higher dividend yield at 14.67%, compared with 2.17% for DIVB.

What is the main difference between DVDN and DIVB?

DVDN is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while DIVB is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Kingsbarn and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.72% for DVDN and 0.05% for DIVB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DIVB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.