DVAL vs. BGIG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DVAL (BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF) and BGIG (Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DVAL returned 12.93% vs 19.51% for BGIG. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DVAL charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for BGIG.

Performance

DVAL vs. BGIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (DVAL) and Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF (BGIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DVAL achieves a 6.15% return, which is significantly lower than BGIG's 9.84% return.

DVAL

• 1D: -0.80%
• 1M: 1.63%
• YTD: 6.15%
• 6M: 7.12%
• 1Y: 12.93%
• 3Y*: 12.66%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BGIG

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 1.82%
• YTD: 9.84%
• 6M: 9.56%
• 1Y: 19.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DVAL vs. BGIG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DVAL BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF	6.15%	8.74%	12.84%	4.88%
BGIG Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF	9.84%	12.49%	16.84%	4.55%

Correlation

The correlation between DVAL and BGIG is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2023	0.78

The correlation between DVAL and BGIG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

DVAL vs. BGIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DVAL	BGIG
Financial Services	31.6%	14.8%
Industrials	14.7%	10.6%
Technology	11.1%	24.6%
Consumer Cyclical	10.2%	5.4%
Communication Services	10.0%	-
Healthcare	7.9%	14.6%
Consumer Defensive	6.6%	6.9%
Energy	6.1%	11.2%
Utilities	1.1%	7.9%
Basic Materials	0.1%	0.6%
Real Estate	-	3.5%

Return for Risk

DVAL vs. BGIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DVAL

DVAL Risk / Return Rank: 37
DVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
DVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
DVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 32
DVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
DVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 42

BGIG

BGIG Risk / Return Rank: 68
BGIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
BGIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
BGIG Omega Ratio Rank: 65
BGIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
BGIG Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DVAL vs. BGIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (DVAL) and Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF (BGIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DVAL	BGIG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.23	2.18	-0.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.84	3.13	-1.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.39	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.09	3.37	-1.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.71	12.97	-6.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DVAL vs. BGIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DVAL Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the BGIG Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DVAL and BGIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DVAL	BGIG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.23	2.18	-0.95
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.76	1.38	-0.62

Drawdowns

DVAL vs. BGIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DVAL drawdown since its inception was -18.11%, which is greater than BGIG's maximum drawdown of -13.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVAL and BGIG.

Drawdown Indicators

	DVAL	BGIG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.11%	-13.24%	-4.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.20%	-5.81%	-0.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.11%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.09%	-0.28%	-0.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.64%	-1.70%	-1.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.93%	1.51%	+0.42%

Volatility

DVAL vs. BGIG - Volatility Comparison

BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (DVAL) has a higher volatility of 2.73% compared to Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF (BGIG) at 2.57%. This indicates that DVAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BGIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DVAL	BGIG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.73%	2.57%	+0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.62%	6.72%	+0.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.59%	9.00%	+1.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.24%	11.94%	+2.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.24%	11.94%	+2.30%

DVAL vs. BGIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

DVAL has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than BGIG's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

DVAL vs. BGIG - Dividend Comparison

DVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, more than BGIG's 1.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BGIG Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF	1.75%	1.89%	2.02%	0.78%	0.00%
DVAL BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF	1.88%	2.00%	2.82%	1.16%	13.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DVAL and BGIG in my portfolio?

DVAL and BGIG have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DVAL or BGIG?

DVAL has higher volatility (2.73%) compared to BGIG (2.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DVAL dropped -18.11% vs BGIG's -13.24%.

Which ETF is better, DVAL or BGIG?

On 1-year performance, BGIG leads with 19.51% vs 12.93% for DVAL. On fees, BGIG is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, BGIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DVAL or BGIG?

Over the 1-year period, BGIG has performed better with a 19.51% return vs 12.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DVAL or BGIG?

BGIG is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for DVAL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DVAL or BGIG?

DVAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.88%, compared with 1.75% for BGIG.

What is the main difference between DVAL and BGIG?

They also come from different issuers: BrandywineGLOBAL and Bahl & Gaynor. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for DVAL and 0.45% for BGIG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BGIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.