DUST vs. SLV
DUST (Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X Shares) and SLV (iShares Silver Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - DUST is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index (-300%), while SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DUST returned -52.03%/yr vs 12.68%/yr for SLV. At a correlation of -0.72, they often move in opposite directions. DUST charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SLV.
Performance
DUST vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DUST achieves a -17.98% return, which is significantly lower than SLV's -13.49% return. Over the past 10 years, DUST has underperformed SLV with an annualized return of -52.03%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.68% annualized return.
DUST
- 1D
- 8.73%
- 1M
- 10.22%
- YTD
- -17.98%
- 6M
- -9.99%
- 1Y
- -73.95%
- 3Y*
- -62.05%
- 5Y*
- -48.30%
- 10Y*
- -52.03%
SLV
- 1D
- -5.40%
- 1M
- -18.48%
- YTD
- -13.49%
- 6M
- -14.05%
- 1Y
- 69.08%
- 3Y*
- 39.38%
- 5Y*
- 18.31%
- 10Y*
- 12.68%
DUST vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DUST Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X Shares | -17.98% | -88.72% | -29.51% | -27.63% | -22.70% | -4.82% | -85.75% | -75.11% | -3.27% | -51.00% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | -13.49% | 144.66% | 20.89% | -1.09% | 2.37% | -12.45% | 47.30% | 14.88% | -9.19% | 5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between DUST and SLV is -0.79, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2010 | -0.72 |
The correlation between DUST and SLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.79 to -0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DUST vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
DUST
SLV
DUST vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X Shares (DUST) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DUST | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.25 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.86 | 1.47 | -2.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.13 | 3.16 | -4.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DUST vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DUST drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than SLV's maximum drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUST and SLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DUST | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -76.28% | -23.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -86.15% | -47.23% | -38.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -97.55% | -47.23% | -50.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.68% | -47.23% | -51.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.98% | -47.23% | -52.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -47.23% | -52.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -83.38% | -44.65% | -38.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 65.24% | 21.91% | +43.33% |
Volatility
DUST vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X Shares (DUST) has a higher volatility of 34.13% compared to iShares Silver Trust (SLV) at 14.34%. This indicates that DUST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DUST | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 34.13% | 14.34% | +19.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 77.03% | 59.27% | +17.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 94.59% | 60.33% | +34.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.10% | 36.59% | +36.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 87.25% | 32.09% | +55.16% |
DUST vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
DUST has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
DUST vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
DUST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.95%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DUST Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X Shares | 7.95% | 12.51% | 4.99% | 4.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.60% | 2.50% | 0.37% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DUST and SLV have a correlation of -0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DUST has higher volatility (34.13%) compared to SLV (14.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUST dropped -100.00% vs SLV's -76.28%.
On 10-year performance, SLV leads with 12.68% vs -52.03% for DUST. On fees, SLV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SLV has been the lower-risk option at 14.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SLV has performed better with a 12.68% return vs -52.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SLV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for DUST.
DUST has the higher dividend yield at 7.95%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.
DUST is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SLV is Silver. DUST tracks NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index (-300%), while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for DUST and 0.50% for SLV.
SLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DUST and SLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer