DUST vs. MOOD
DUST (Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X Shares) and MOOD (Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DUST is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index (-300%), while MOOD is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Relative Sentiment. DUST is passively managed, while MOOD is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DUST returned -58.72%/yr vs 19.36%/yr for MOOD. At a correlation of -0.58, they often move in opposite directions. DUST charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for MOOD.
Performance
DUST vs. MOOD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DUST achieves a -9.29% return, which is significantly lower than MOOD's 13.29% return.
DUST
- 1D
- 5.73%
- 1M
- 13.84%
- 6M
- 13.42%
- YTD
- -9.29%
- 1Y
- -71.58%
- 3Y*
- -58.72%
- 5Y*
- -46.95%
- 10Y*
- -49.61%
MOOD
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- -0.72%
- 6M
- 7.35%
- YTD
- 13.29%
- 1Y
- 30.71%
- 3Y*
- 19.36%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DUST vs. MOOD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DUST Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X Shares | -9.29% | -88.72% | -29.51% | -27.63% | -18.71% |
MOOD Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF | 13.29% | 30.39% | 12.53% | 12.56% | -3.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between DUST and MOOD is -0.73, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2022 | -0.58 |
The correlation between DUST and MOOD shifts across timeframes, from -0.73 (1 year) to -0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DUST vs. MOOD — Risk / Return Rank
DUST
MOOD
DUST vs. MOOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X Shares (DUST) and Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DUST | MOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.41 | -0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.84 | 3.18 | -4.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.07 | 9.68 | -10.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DUST vs. MOOD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DUST drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than MOOD's maximum drawdown of -14.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUST and MOOD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DUST | MOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -14.34% | -85.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -85.83% | -9.71% | -76.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -97.55% | -9.71% | -87.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -2.06% | -97.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -83.44% | -2.31% | -81.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 66.80% | 3.18% | +63.62% |
Volatility
DUST vs. MOOD - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X Shares (DUST) has a higher volatility of 30.11% compared to Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) at 4.02%. This indicates that DUST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOOD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DUST | MOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 30.11% | 4.02% | +26.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 77.11% | 12.60% | +64.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 95.53% | 14.71% | +80.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.48% | 12.13% | +61.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 86.97% | 12.13% | +74.84% |
DUST vs. MOOD - Expense Ratio Comparison
DUST has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than MOOD's 0.73% expense ratio.
Dividends
DUST vs. MOOD - Dividend Comparison
DUST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, more than MOOD's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DUST Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X Shares | 4.18% | 12.51% | 4.99% | 4.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.60% | 2.50% | 0.37% |
MOOD Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF | 0.36% | 0.40% | 1.33% | 1.34% | 1.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DUST and MOOD have a correlation of -0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DUST has higher volatility (30.11%) compared to MOOD (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUST dropped -100.00% vs MOOD's -14.34%.
On 3-year performance, MOOD leads with 19.36% vs -58.72% for DUST. On fees, MOOD is cheaper at 0.73% per year. On volatility, MOOD has been the lower-risk option at 4.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, MOOD has performed better with a 19.36% return vs -58.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MOOD is cheaper with a 0.73% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for DUST.
DUST has the higher dividend yield at 4.18%, compared with 0.36% for MOOD.
DUST is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while MOOD is Tactical Allocation. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Relative Sentiment. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for DUST and 0.73% for MOOD.
MOOD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DUST and MOOD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer