DUST vs. IFED
DUST (Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X Shares) and IFED (ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds - DUST tracks the NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index (-300%) while IFED tracks the IFED Large-Cap US Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DUST returned -62.05%/yr vs 16.54%/yr for IFED. At a correlation of -0.25, they often move in opposite directions. DUST charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for IFED.
Performance
DUST vs. IFED - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DUST achieves a -17.98% return, which is significantly lower than IFED's -3.07% return.
DUST
- 1D
- 8.73%
- 1M
- 10.22%
- YTD
- -17.98%
- 6M
- -9.99%
- 1Y
- -73.95%
- 3Y*
- -62.05%
- 5Y*
- -48.30%
- 10Y*
- -52.03%
IFED
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 2.47%
- YTD
- -3.07%
- 6M
- -3.90%
- 1Y
- 2.52%
- 3Y*
- 16.54%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DUST vs. IFED - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DUST Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X Shares | -17.98% | -88.72% | -29.51% | -27.63% | -22.70% | -6.79% |
IFED ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN | -3.07% | 15.02% | 23.04% | 20.78% | -1.46% | 8.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between DUST and IFED is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2021 | -0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DUST vs. IFED — Risk / Return Rank
DUST
IFED
DUST vs. IFED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X Shares (DUST) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DUST | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.04 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.86 | 0.17 | -1.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.13 | 0.43 | -1.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DUST vs. IFED - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DUST drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than IFED's maximum drawdown of -22.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUST and IFED.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DUST | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -22.36% | -77.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -86.15% | -14.65% | -71.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -97.55% | -22.36% | -75.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -5.05% | -94.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -83.38% | -5.83% | -77.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 65.24% | 5.88% | +59.36% |
Volatility
DUST vs. IFED - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X Shares (DUST) has a higher volatility of 34.13% compared to ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) at 6.74%. This indicates that DUST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFED based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DUST | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 34.13% | 6.74% | +27.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 77.03% | 13.81% | +63.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 94.59% | 16.84% | +77.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.10% | 19.92% | +53.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 87.25% | 19.92% | +67.33% |
DUST vs. IFED - Expense Ratio Comparison
DUST has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than IFED's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
DUST vs. IFED - Dividend Comparison
DUST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.95%, while IFED has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DUST Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X Shares | 7.95% | 12.51% | 4.99% | 4.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.60% | 2.50% | 0.37% |
IFED ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DUST and IFED have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DUST has higher volatility (34.13%) compared to IFED (6.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUST dropped -100.00% vs IFED's -22.36%.
On 3-year performance, IFED leads with 16.54% vs -62.05% for DUST. On fees, IFED is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, IFED has been the lower-risk option at 6.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IFED has performed better with a 16.54% return vs -62.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IFED is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for DUST.
DUST has the higher dividend yield at 7.95%, compared with 0.00% for IFED.
DUST tracks NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index (-300%), while IFED tracks IFED Large-Cap US Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and UBS. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for DUST and 0.45% for IFED.
IFED currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.15 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DUST and IFED
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer