DUST vs. EPU
DUST (Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X Shares) and EPU (iShares MSCI Peru ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DUST is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index (-300%), while EPU is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Peru Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DUST returned -52.03%/yr vs 14.73%/yr for EPU. At a correlation of -0.50, they often move in opposite directions. DUST charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for EPU.
Performance
DUST vs. EPU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DUST achieves a -17.98% return, which is significantly lower than EPU's 18.54% return. Over the past 10 years, DUST has underperformed EPU with an annualized return of -52.03%, while EPU has yielded a comparatively higher 14.73% annualized return.
DUST
- 1D
- 8.73%
- 1M
- 10.22%
- YTD
- -17.98%
- 6M
- -9.99%
- 1Y
- -73.95%
- 3Y*
- -62.05%
- 5Y*
- -48.30%
- 10Y*
- -52.03%
EPU
- 1D
- -3.70%
- 1M
- 3.83%
- YTD
- 18.54%
- 6M
- 17.84%
- 1Y
- 83.34%
- 3Y*
- 46.58%
- 5Y*
- 29.75%
- 10Y*
- 14.73%
DUST vs. EPU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DUST Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X Shares | -17.98% | -88.72% | -29.51% | -27.63% | -22.70% | -4.82% | -85.75% | -75.11% | -3.27% | -51.00% |
EPU iShares MSCI Peru ETF | 18.54% | 86.87% | 21.73% | 25.34% | 2.05% | -11.81% | -4.31% | 7.30% | -12.17% | 29.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between DUST and EPU is -0.72, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2010 | -0.50 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between DUST and EPU has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.50 to -0.72, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DUST vs. EPU — Risk / Return Rank
DUST
EPU
DUST vs. EPU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X Shares (DUST) and iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DUST | EPU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.42 | -0.57 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.86 | 4.02 | -4.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.13 | 11.51 | -12.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DUST vs. EPU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DUST drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than EPU's maximum drawdown of -60.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUST and EPU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DUST | EPU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -60.62% | -39.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -86.15% | -20.85% | -65.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -97.55% | -20.85% | -76.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.68% | -35.59% | -63.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.98% | -50.97% | -49.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -8.61% | -91.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -83.38% | -18.79% | -64.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 65.24% | 7.27% | +57.97% |
Volatility
DUST vs. EPU - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X Shares (DUST) has a higher volatility of 34.13% compared to iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU) at 12.75%. This indicates that DUST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EPU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DUST | EPU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 34.13% | 12.75% | +21.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 77.03% | 27.23% | +49.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 94.59% | 31.33% | +63.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.10% | 25.12% | +47.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 87.25% | 23.66% | +63.59% |
DUST vs. EPU - Expense Ratio Comparison
DUST has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than EPU's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
DUST vs. EPU - Dividend Comparison
DUST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.95%, more than EPU's 2.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DUST Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X Shares | 7.95% | 12.51% | 4.99% | 4.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.60% | 2.50% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EPU iShares MSCI Peru ETF | 2.02% | 1.63% | 5.78% | 4.17% | 5.56% | 3.13% | 1.91% | 2.67% | 1.53% | 3.30% | 0.85% | 1.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DUST and EPU have a correlation of -0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DUST has higher volatility (34.13%) compared to EPU (12.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUST dropped -100.00% vs EPU's -60.62%.
On 10-year performance, EPU leads with 14.73% vs -52.03% for DUST. On fees, EPU is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, EPU has been the lower-risk option at 12.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EPU has performed better with a 14.73% return vs -52.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EPU is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for DUST.
DUST has the higher dividend yield at 7.95%, compared with 2.02% for EPU.
DUST is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while EPU is Mid Cap Blend Equities. DUST tracks NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index (-300%), while EPU tracks MSCI All Peru Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for DUST and 0.59% for EPU.
EPU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DUST and EPU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer