DUSG vs. XSMO
DUSG (U.S. Small Cap Growth Portfolio: ETF Class Shares) and XSMO (Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DUSG is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional Fund Advisors, while XSMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Momentum Index. DUSG is actively managed, while XSMO is passively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DUSG charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for XSMO.
Performance
DUSG vs. XSMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DUSG
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XSMO
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -1.24%
- 6M
- 16.91%
- YTD
- 23.62%
- 1Y
- 31.09%
- 3Y*
- 22.80%
- 5Y*
- 12.98%
- 10Y*
- 14.38%
DUSG vs. XSMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DUSG U.S. Small Cap Growth Portfolio: ETF Class Shares | 2.66% |
XSMO Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF | 0.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between DUSG and XSMO is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DUSG vs. XSMO — Risk / Return Rank
DUSG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XSMO
DUSG vs. XSMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Small Cap Growth Portfolio: ETF Class Shares (DUSG) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DUSG | XSMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.27 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.51 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.30 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DUSG vs. XSMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DUSG drawdown since its inception was -4.19%, smaller than the maximum XSMO drawdown of -58.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUSG and XSMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DUSG | XSMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.19% | -58.06% | +53.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.34% | -5.21% | +2.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.13% | -11.08% | +9.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.76% | — |
Volatility
DUSG vs. XSMO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DUSG | XSMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.44% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.28% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.71% | 19.65% | -4.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.71% | 22.61% | -7.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.71% | 24.10% | -9.39% |
DUSG vs. XSMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
DUSG has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than XSMO's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
DUSG vs. XSMO - Dividend Comparison
DUSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than XSMO's 0.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DUSG U.S. Small Cap Growth Portfolio: ETF Class Shares | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XSMO Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF | 0.54% | 0.75% | 0.63% | 0.96% | 1.19% | 0.30% | 0.82% | 0.69% | 0.66% | 0.27% | 0.30% | 0.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DUSG and XSMO have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DUSG is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DUSG is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for XSMO.
XSMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.54%, compared with 0.14% for DUSG.
DUSG is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while XSMO is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional Fund Advisors and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for DUSG and 0.36% for XSMO.
Find the right allocation for DUSG and XSMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer