DUSG vs. RSMC

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

DUSG (Dimensional U.S. Small Cap Growth ETF) and RSMC (Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DUSG charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for RSMC.

Performance

DUSG vs. RSMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional U.S. Small Cap Growth ETF (DUSG) and Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF (RSMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

DUSG

• 1D: 0.69%
• 1M: 0.55%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RSMC

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: -1.47%
• 6M: 5.19%
• YTD: 12.00%
• 1Y: 9.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DUSG vs. RSMC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
DUSG Dimensional U.S. Small Cap Growth ETF	3.37%
RSMC Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF	0.28%

Correlation

The correlation between DUSG and RSMC is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026	0.90

Return for Risk

DUSG vs. RSMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DUSG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RSMC

RSMC Risk / Return Rank: 22
RSMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
RSMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
RSMC Omega Ratio Rank: 19
RSMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
RSMC Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DUSG vs. RSMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional U.S. Small Cap Growth ETF (DUSG) and Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF (RSMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DUSG	RSMC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.56	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.91	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.11	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.92	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	2.74	—

Drawdowns

DUSG vs. RSMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUSG drawdown since its inception was -4.19%, smaller than the maximum RSMC drawdown of -22.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUSG and RSMC.

Drawdown Indicators

	DUSG	RSMC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.19%	-22.33%	+18.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.49%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.66%	-2.21%	+0.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.14%	-5.00%	+3.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.51%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DUSG	RSMC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.01%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.60%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.63%	17.26%	-2.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.63%	20.06%	-5.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.63%	20.06%	-5.43%

DUSG vs. RSMC - Expense Ratio Comparison

DUSG has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than RSMC's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

DUSG vs. RSMC - Dividend Comparison

DUSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, while RSMC has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM
DUSG Dimensional U.S. Small Cap Growth ETF	0.14%
RSMC Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DUSG and RSMC in my portfolio?

DUSG and RSMC have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DUSG or RSMC?

On fees, DUSG is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DUSG or RSMC?

DUSG is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for RSMC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DUSG or RSMC?

DUSG has the higher dividend yield at 0.14%, compared with 0.00% for RSMC.

What is the main difference between DUSG and RSMC?

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional Fund Advisors and Rockefeller. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for DUSG and 0.75% for RSMC.