DUSB vs. FLRT
Compare and contrast key facts about Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF (DUSB) and Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT).
DUSB and FLRT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DUSB is an actively managed fund by Dimensional. It was launched on Sep 26, 2023. FLRT is an actively managed fund by Pacific Life. It was launched on Feb 19, 2015.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: DUSB or FLRT.
Correlation
The correlation between DUSB and FLRT is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
DUSB vs. FLRT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
DUSB:
10.22
FLRT:
6.56
DUSB:
21.89
FLRT:
10.69
DUSB:
5.12
FLRT:
3.18
DUSB:
46.78
FLRT:
17.25
DUSB:
293.88
FLRT:
85.14
DUSB:
0.02%
FLRT:
0.11%
DUSB:
0.54%
FLRT:
1.38%
DUSB:
-0.12%
FLRT:
-20.96%
DUSB:
-0.03%
FLRT:
0.00%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DUSB achieves a 0.60% return, which is significantly lower than FLRT's 0.85% return.
DUSB
0.60%
0.42%
2.56%
5.46%
N/A
N/A
FLRT
0.85%
0.40%
4.02%
8.92%
5.64%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DUSB vs. FLRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
DUSB has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FLRT's 0.69% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
DUSB vs. FLRT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
DUSB
FLRT
DUSB vs. FLRT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF (DUSB) and Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
DUSB vs. FLRT - Dividend Comparison
DUSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%, less than FLRT's 7.79% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DUSB Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF | 5.03% | 4.92% | 1.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLRT Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF | 7.79% | 7.93% | 8.42% | 5.81% | 3.16% | 3.51% | 4.31% | 3.97% | 3.20% | 3.38% | 3.21% |
Drawdowns
DUSB vs. FLRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DUSB drawdown since its inception was -0.12%, smaller than the maximum FLRT drawdown of -20.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUSB and FLRT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
DUSB vs. FLRT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF (DUSB) is 0.15%, while Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT) has a volatility of 0.33%. This indicates that DUSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.