PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DUSB vs. EVSB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DUSB vs. EVSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF (DUSB) and Eaton Vance Ultra-Short Income ETF (EVSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DUSB having a 1.68% return and EVSB slightly lower at 1.66%.


DUSB

1D
0.02%
1M
0.34%
YTD
1.68%
6M
1.97%
1Y
4.31%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EVSB

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.40%
YTD
1.66%
6M
2.00%
1Y
4.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DUSB vs. EVSB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DUSB
Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF
1.68%4.53%5.60%1.47%
EVSB
Eaton Vance Ultra-Short Income ETF
1.66%5.12%6.04%1.84%

Correlation

The correlation between DUSB and EVSB is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2023

0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DUSB vs. EVSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DUSB
DUSB Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
DUSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DUSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
DUSB Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
DUSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
DUSB Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

EVSB
EVSB Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
EVSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVSB Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
EVSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVSB Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DUSB vs. EVSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF (DUSB) and Eaton Vance Ultra-Short Income ETF (EVSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DUSBEVSBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+13.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

4.87

2.76

+2.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

55.00

18.60

+36.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

332.80

109.03

+223.77

DUSB vs. EVSB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DUSB Sharpe Ratio is 10.10, which is higher than the EVSB Sharpe Ratio of 6.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DUSB and EVSB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DUSBEVSBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.10

6.11

+3.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

9.88

6.94

+2.94

Drawdowns

DUSB vs. EVSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUSB drawdown since its inception was -0.29%, smaller than the maximum EVSB drawdown of -0.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUSB and EVSB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DUSBEVSBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.29%

-0.31%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.08%

-0.25%

+0.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-0.05%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.01%

-0.02%

+0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.01%

0.04%

-0.03%

Volatility

DUSB vs. EVSB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF (DUSB) is 0.13%, while Eaton Vance Ultra-Short Income ETF (EVSB) has a volatility of 0.19%. This indicates that DUSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EVSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DUSBEVSBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.13%

0.19%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.30%

0.51%

-0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43%

0.77%

-0.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.52%

0.82%

-0.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.52%

0.82%

-0.30%

DUSB vs. EVSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

DUSB has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EVSB's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DUSB vs. EVSB - Dividend Comparison

DUSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.06%, less than EVSB's 4.63% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
DUSB
Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF
4.06%4.32%4.92%1.23%
EVSB
Eaton Vance Ultra-Short Income ETF
4.63%4.63%5.18%1.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


DUSB and EVSB have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EVSB has higher volatility (0.19%) compared to DUSB (0.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUSB dropped -0.29% vs EVSB's -0.31%.

On 1-year performance, EVSB leads with 4.71% vs 4.31% for DUSB. On fees, DUSB is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EVSB has performed better with a 4.71% return vs 4.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DUSB is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for EVSB.

EVSB has the higher dividend yield at 4.63%, compared with 4.06% for DUSB.

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Eaton Vance. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for DUSB and 0.17% for EVSB.

DUSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.10 vs 6.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DUSB and EVSB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer