PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DURPX vs. ALSMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DURPX vs. ALSMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA US High Relative Profitability Portfolio (DURPX) and Archer Multi Cap Fund (ALSMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DURPX achieves a 9.01% return, which is significantly lower than ALSMX's 24.45% return.


DURPX

1D
0.24%
1M
5.70%
YTD
9.01%
6M
9.29%
1Y
20.74%
3Y*
18.91%
5Y*
12.82%
10Y*

ALSMX

1D
-0.32%
1M
3.60%
YTD
24.45%
6M
23.36%
1Y
41.37%
3Y*
25.08%
5Y*
13.26%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DURPX vs. ALSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DURPX
DFA US High Relative Profitability Portfolio
9.01%12.81%20.49%21.85%-11.82%25.27%19.29%
ALSMX
Archer Multi Cap Fund
24.45%11.47%21.78%25.14%-20.12%16.58%16.01%

Correlation

The correlation between DURPX and ALSMX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2020

0.87

The correlation between DURPX and ALSMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DURPX vs. ALSMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DURPX
DURPX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
DURPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DURPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
DURPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
DURPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
DURPX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

ALSMX
ALSMX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
ALSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ALSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DURPX vs. ALSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA US High Relative Profitability Portfolio (DURPX) and Archer Multi Cap Fund (ALSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DURPXALSMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.89

2.60

-0.71

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.69

3.55

-0.86

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.46

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

4.42

-1.95

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.50

19.42

-8.91

DURPX vs. ALSMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DURPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the ALSMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DURPX and ALSMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DURPXALSMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

2.60

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.01

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.01

+0.84

Drawdowns

DURPX vs. ALSMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DURPX drawdown since its inception was -31.02%, smaller than the maximum ALSMX drawdown of -97.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DURPX and ALSMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DURPXALSMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.02%

-97.87%

+66.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.67%

-9.42%

+0.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.38%

-97.87%

+79.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.90%

-97.87%

+75.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-96.45%

+96.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.07%

-27.94%

+23.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

2.15%

-0.11%

Volatility

DURPX vs. ALSMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA US High Relative Profitability Portfolio (DURPX) is 2.40%, while Archer Multi Cap Fund (ALSMX) has a volatility of 4.90%. This indicates that DURPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DURPXALSMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.40%

4.90%

-2.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.60%

13.17%

-4.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.28%

16.08%

-4.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.87%

1,291.55%

-1,275.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.59%

1,140.95%

-1,123.36%

DURPX vs. ALSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DURPX has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than ALSMX's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

DURPX vs. ALSMX - Dividend Comparison

DURPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than ALSMX's 5.75% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ALSMX
Archer Multi Cap Fund
5.75%7.16%3.62%0.46%7.12%1.62%0.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DURPX
DFA US High Relative Profitability Portfolio
0.97%1.05%1.20%1.49%3.65%4.12%1.34%1.36%1.69%0.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


DURPX and ALSMX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALSMX has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to DURPX (2.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DURPX dropped -31.02% vs ALSMX's -97.87%.

ALSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DURPX and ALSMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer