PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DURA vs. SCHK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DURA vs. SCHK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA) and Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DURA achieves a 15.95% return, which is significantly higher than SCHK's 10.36% return.


DURA

1D
-0.06%
1M
2.73%
6M
8.23%
YTD
15.95%
1Y
22.22%
3Y*
9.89%
5Y*
7.63%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.24%

SCHK

1D
0.61%
1M
0.08%
6M
8.83%
YTD
10.36%
1Y
21.37%
3Y*
19.19%
5Y*
12.06%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$68.16K$85.30K$69.37K
$28.76M$27.18M$27.56M

DURA vs. SCHK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DURA
VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF
15.95%7.61%8.51%0.82%2.41%15.53%0.04%27.55%-3.77%
SCHK
Schwab 1000 Index ETF
10.36%17.23%24.48%26.63%-19.51%26.17%20.75%31.31%-6.31%

Correlation

The correlation between DURA and SCHK is 0.15, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2018

0.65

Over the past year, the correlation between DURA and SCHK has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DURA vs. SCHK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DURA
SCHK

Consumer Defensive

22.3%
4.5%

Healthcare

15.4%
9.2%

Energy

14.5%
3.1%

Financial Services

9.9%
11.8%

Technology

8.9%
36.7%

Communication Services

8.4%
9.4%

Utilities

6.9%
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

6.0%
9.6%

Industrials

5.6%
9.5%

Basic Materials

2.0%
1.9%

Real Estate

-

2.2%

Consumer Defensive

DURA
22.3%
SCHK
4.5%

Healthcare

DURA
15.4%
SCHK
9.2%

Energy

DURA
14.5%
SCHK
3.1%

Financial Services

DURA
9.9%
SCHK
11.8%

Technology

DURA
8.9%
SCHK
36.7%

Communication Services

DURA
8.4%
SCHK
9.4%

Utilities

DURA
6.9%
SCHK
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

DURA
6.0%
SCHK
9.6%

Industrials

DURA
5.6%
SCHK
9.5%

Basic Materials

DURA
2.0%
SCHK
1.9%

Real Estate

DURA

-

SCHK
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DURA vs. SCHK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DURA
DURA Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
DURA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DURA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
DURA Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
DURA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
DURA Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHK
SCHK Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SCHK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHK Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHK Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DURA vs. SCHK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA) and Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DURASCHKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.26

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

2.17

+0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.15

9.29

+0.87

DURA vs. SCHK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DURA Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the SCHK Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DURA and SCHK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DURA vs. SCHK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DURA drawdown since its inception was -33.15%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHK drawdown of -34.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DURA and SCHK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DURASCHKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.15%

-34.80%

+1.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.53%

-8.97%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.27%

-19.21%

+4.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.80%

-25.44%

+9.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.69%

-1.35%

-0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.88%

-5.12%

+1.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

2.09%

+0.05%

Volatility

DURA vs. SCHK - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA) has a higher volatility of 3.81% compared to Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) at 3.51%. This indicates that DURA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DURASCHKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.81%

3.51%

+0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.15%

10.29%

-2.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.83%

13.13%

+1.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.67%

17.34%

-3.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.89%

19.04%

-2.15%

DURA vs. SCHK - Expense Ratio Comparison

DURA has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHK's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

DURA vs. SCHK - Dividend Comparison

DURA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, more than SCHK's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DURA
VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF
3.13%3.59%3.33%3.58%3.01%2.89%3.49%3.83%0.66%0.00%
SCHK
Schwab 1000 Index ETF
1.04%1.09%1.20%1.38%1.57%1.17%1.58%1.82%1.80%0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


DURA and SCHK have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DURA has higher volatility (3.81%) compared to SCHK (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DURA dropped -33.15% vs SCHK's -34.80%.

On 5-year performance, SCHK leads with 12.06% vs 7.63% for DURA. On fees, SCHK is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHK has been the lower-risk option at 3.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SCHK has performed better with a 12.06% return vs 7.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHK is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for DURA.

DURA has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 1.04% for SCHK.

DURA tracks Morningstar US Dividend Valuation Index, while SCHK tracks Schwab 1000 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for DURA and 0.03% for SCHK.

SCHK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DURA and SCHK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer