DURA vs. QMAR

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA) and FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR).

DURA and QMAR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DURA is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Dividend Valuation Index. It was launched on Oct 30, 2018. QMAR is an actively managed fund by First Trust. It was launched on Mar 19, 2021.

Performance

DURA vs. QMAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA) and FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DURA vs. QMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DURA VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF	10.74%	7.61%	8.51%	0.82%	2.41%	11.37%
QMAR FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March	1.87%	10.89%	16.11%	35.47%	-16.56%	12.31%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DURA achieves a 10.74% return, which is significantly higher than QMAR's 1.87% return.

DURA

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: -2.62%
• YTD: 10.74%
• 6M: 12.42%
• 1Y: 13.75%
• 3Y*: 9.89%
• 5Y*: 7.91%
• 10Y*: —

QMAR

• 1D: 2.41%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: 1.87%
• 6M: 4.47%
• 1Y: 18.84%
• 3Y*: 14.87%
• 5Y*: 10.44%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DURA vs. QMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DURA has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than QMAR's 0.90% expense ratio.

QMAR

FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March

DURA

VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF

Return for Risk

DURA vs. QMAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DURA

DURA Risk / Return Rank: 45
DURA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
DURA Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
DURA Omega Ratio Rank: 50
DURA Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
DURA Martin Ratio Rank: 44

QMAR

QMAR Risk / Return Rank: 85
QMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
QMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
QMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 95
QMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
QMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DURA vs. QMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA) and FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DURA	QMAR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.76	1.43	-0.67
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.17	2.27	-1.09
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.46	-0.28
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.17	2.03	-0.86
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.18	14.07	-9.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DURA vs. QMAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DURA Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is lower than the QMAR Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DURA and QMAR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DURA	QMAR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76	1.43	-0.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59	0.75	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	0.76	-0.24

Correlation

The correlation between DURA and QMAR is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

DURA vs. QMAR - Dividend Comparison

DURA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, while QMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DURA VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF	3.25%	3.59%	3.33%	3.58%	3.01%	2.89%	3.49%	3.83%	0.66%
QMAR FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

DURA vs. QMAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DURA drawdown since its inception was -33.15%, which is greater than QMAR's maximum drawdown of -19.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DURA and QMAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	DURA	QMAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.15%	-19.83%	-13.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.36%	-9.23%	-3.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.80%	-19.83%	+4.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.62%	-0.88%	-1.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.96%	-3.40%	-0.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.60%	1.33%	+2.27%

Volatility

DURA vs. QMAR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA) is 2.76%, while FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR) has a volatility of 3.50%. This indicates that DURA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DURA	QMAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.76%	3.50%	-0.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.56%	4.62%	+7.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.17%	13.25%	+4.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.55%	14.05%	-0.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.09%	14.03%	+3.06%