DURA vs. DMAY
DURA (VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF) and DMAY (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - DURA tracks the Morningstar US Dividend Valuation Index while DMAY tracks the Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect May Series Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DURA returned 7.29%/yr vs 7.16%/yr for DMAY. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DURA charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DMAY.
Performance
DURA vs. DMAY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DURA achieves a 12.48% return, which is significantly higher than DMAY's 4.42% return.
DURA
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 12.48%
- 6M
- 12.41%
- 1Y
- 21.36%
- 3Y*
- 10.54%
- 5Y*
- 7.29%
- 10Y*
- —
DMAY
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- YTD
- 4.42%
- 6M
- 5.19%
- 1Y
- 12.37%
- 3Y*
- 11.96%
- 5Y*
- 7.16%
- 10Y*
- —
DURA vs. DMAY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DURA VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF | 12.48% | 7.61% | 8.51% | 0.82% | 2.41% | 15.53% | 16.43% |
DMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May | 4.42% | 11.05% | 12.82% | 15.40% | -9.98% | 6.14% | 6.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between DURA and DMAY is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2020 | 0.57 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DURA and DMAY has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
DURA vs. DMAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DURA
DMAY
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Healthcare
Financial Services
Technology
Communication Services
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
DURA
DMAY
Energy
DURA
DMAY
Healthcare
DURA
DMAY
Financial Services
DURA
DMAY
Technology
DURA
DMAY
Communication Services
DURA
DMAY
Utilities
DURA
DMAY
Consumer Cyclical
DURA
DMAY
Industrials
DURA
DMAY
Basic Materials
DURA
DMAY
Real Estate
DURA
-
DMAY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DURA vs. DMAY — Risk / Return Rank
DURA
DMAY
DURA vs. DMAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DURA | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.45 | 2.65 | -1.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.18 | 4.00 | -1.82 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.60 | -0.28 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.51 | 3.73 | -1.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.60 | 22.76 | -12.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DURA | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.45 | 2.65 | -1.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.80 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.88 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
DURA vs. DMAY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DURA drawdown since its inception was -33.15%, which is greater than DMAY's maximum drawdown of -13.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DURA and DMAY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DURA | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.15% | -13.90% | -19.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.53% | -3.36% | -5.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.27% | -12.38% | -1.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.80% | -13.90% | -1.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.55% | -0.30% | -2.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.92% | -2.24% | -1.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.02% | 0.55% | +1.47% |
Volatility
DURA vs. DMAY - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA) has a higher volatility of 3.29% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY) at 0.84%. This indicates that DURA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DURA | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.29% | 0.84% | +2.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.86% | 3.74% | +4.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.79% | 4.73% | +10.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.63% | 9.02% | +4.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 8.43% | +8.56% |
DURA vs. DMAY - Expense Ratio Comparison
DURA has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than DMAY's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
DURA vs. DMAY - Dividend Comparison
DURA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, while DMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DURA VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF | 3.30% | 3.59% | 3.33% | 3.58% | 3.01% | 2.89% | 3.49% | 3.83% | 0.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DURA and DMAY have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DURA has higher volatility (3.29%) compared to DMAY (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DURA dropped -33.15% vs DMAY's -13.90%.
On 5-year performance, DURA leads with 7.29% vs 7.16% for DMAY. On fees, DURA is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, DMAY has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DURA has performed better with a 7.29% return vs 7.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DURA is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DMAY.
DURA has the higher dividend yield at 3.30%, compared with 0.00% for DMAY.
DURA tracks Morningstar US Dividend Valuation Index, while DMAY tracks Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect May Series Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for DURA and 0.85% for DMAY.
DMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DURA and DMAY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer