DURA vs. AFOS
DURA (VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF) and AFOS (ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DURA charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for AFOS.
Performance
DURA vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DURA achieves a 12.22% return, which is significantly lower than AFOS's 32.42% return.
DURA
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- -0.47%
- YTD
- 12.22%
- 6M
- 12.96%
- 1Y
- 21.75%
- 3Y*
- 10.45%
- 5Y*
- 7.34%
- 10Y*
- —
AFOS
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- 9.94%
- YTD
- 32.42%
- 6M
- 37.62%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DURA vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DURA VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF | 12.22% | 7.05% |
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 32.42% | 36.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between DURA and AFOS is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DURA vs. AFOS — Risk / Return Rank
DURA
AFOS
DURA vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DURA | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.48 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.21 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.56 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.84 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DURA | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 4.39 | -3.86 |
Drawdowns
DURA vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DURA drawdown since its inception was -33.15%, which is greater than AFOS's maximum drawdown of -11.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DURA and AFOS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DURA | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.15% | -11.52% | -21.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.27% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.78% | 0.00% | -2.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.92% | -1.38% | -2.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | — | — |
Volatility
DURA vs. AFOS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DURA | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.34% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.90% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.79% | 20.22% | -5.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.63% | 20.22% | -6.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.00% | 20.22% | -3.22% |
DURA vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DURA has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than AFOS's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
DURA vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison
DURA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, more than AFOS's 0.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 0.22% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DURA VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF | 3.31% | 3.59% | 3.33% | 3.58% | 3.01% | 2.89% | 3.49% | 3.83% | 0.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DURA and AFOS have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DURA is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DURA is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for AFOS.
DURA has the higher dividend yield at 3.31%, compared with 0.22% for AFOS.
They also come from different issuers: VanEck and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for DURA and 0.45% for AFOS.
Find the right allocation for DURA and AFOS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer