DUKQ vs. BLCR

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

DUKQ (Ocean Park Domestic ETF) and BLCR (Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DUKQ returned 27.38% vs 45.01% for BLCR. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DUKQ charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for BLCR.

Performance

DUKQ vs. BLCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ocean Park Domestic ETF (DUKQ) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DUKQ achieves a 13.40% return, which is significantly lower than BLCR's 18.78% return.

DUKQ

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 2.89%
• YTD: 13.40%
• 6M: 12.21%
• 1Y: 27.38%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BLCR

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 1.31%
• YTD: 18.78%
• 6M: 18.51%
• 1Y: 45.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DUKQ vs. BLCR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
DUKQ Ocean Park Domestic ETF	13.40%	5.69%	4.80%
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF	18.78%	30.93%	1.67%

Correlation

The correlation between DUKQ and BLCR is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2024	0.86

The correlation between DUKQ and BLCR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

DUKQ vs. BLCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DUKQ	BLCR
Technology	34.8%	34.3%
Industrials	10.9%	13.7%
Consumer Cyclical	10.3%	11.1%
Financial Services	9.3%	12.5%
Healthcare	8.9%	7.6%
Communication Services	7.7%	14.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	-
Energy	3.7%	2.2%
Utilities	3.7%	1.6%
Real Estate	3.1%	-
Basic Materials	2.7%	2.2%

Return for Risk

DUKQ vs. BLCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DUKQ

DUKQ Risk / Return Rank: 69
DUKQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
DUKQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
DUKQ Omega Ratio Rank: 64
DUKQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
DUKQ Martin Ratio Rank: 77

BLCR

BLCR Risk / Return Rank: 86
BLCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
BLCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
BLCR Omega Ratio Rank: 83
BLCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
BLCR Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DUKQ vs. BLCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ocean Park Domestic ETF (DUKQ) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DUKQ	BLCR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.10	2.77	-0.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.86	3.64	-0.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.47	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.51	4.41	-0.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.40	20.00	-5.60

DUKQ vs. BLCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DUKQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the BLCR Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DUKQ and BLCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DUKQ vs. BLCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUKQ drawdown since its inception was -18.44%, smaller than the maximum BLCR drawdown of -21.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUKQ and BLCR.

Drawdown Indicators

	DUKQ	BLCR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.44%	-21.29%	+2.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.84%	-10.26%	+2.42%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.44%	-1.02%	+0.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.84%	-2.19%	-1.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.91%	2.26%	-0.35%

Volatility

DUKQ vs. BLCR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ocean Park Domestic ETF (DUKQ) is 5.19%, while Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR) has a volatility of 6.10%. This indicates that DUKQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DUKQ	BLCR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.19%	6.10%	-0.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.24%	13.11%	-2.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.15%	16.38%	-3.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.99%	17.65%	-2.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.99%	17.65%	-2.66%

DUKQ vs. BLCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DUKQ has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than BLCR's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

DUKQ vs. BLCR - Dividend Comparison

DUKQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, more than BLCR's 0.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF	0.28%	0.33%	0.75%	0.13%
DUKQ Ocean Park Domestic ETF	0.66%	0.68%	0.28%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DUKQ and BLCR in my portfolio?

DUKQ and BLCR have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DUKQ or BLCR?

BLCR has higher volatility (6.10%) compared to DUKQ (5.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUKQ dropped -18.44% vs BLCR's -21.29%.

Which ETF is better, DUKQ or BLCR?

On 1-year performance, BLCR leads with 45.01% vs 27.38% for DUKQ. On fees, BLCR is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, DUKQ has been the lower-risk option at 5.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DUKQ or BLCR?

Over the 1-year period, BLCR has performed better with a 45.01% return vs 27.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DUKQ or BLCR?

BLCR is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for DUKQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DUKQ or BLCR?

DUKQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.66%, compared with 0.28% for BLCR.

What is the main difference between DUKQ and BLCR?

They also come from different issuers: Ocean Park and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for DUKQ and 0.36% for BLCR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BLCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.