DUKH vs. LNGX
DUKH (Ocean Park High Income ETF) and LNGX (Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DUKH is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by Ocean Park, while LNGX is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Global X U.S. Natural Gas Index. DUKH is actively managed, while LNGX is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.29, they often move in opposite directions. DUKH charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for LNGX.
Performance
DUKH vs. LNGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DUKH achieves a 0.46% return, which is significantly lower than LNGX's 21.25% return.
DUKH
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 0.46%
- 6M
- 0.78%
- 1Y
- 5.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LNGX
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -4.94%
- YTD
- 21.25%
- 6M
- 14.27%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DUKH vs. LNGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DUKH Ocean Park High Income ETF | 0.46% | 0.65% |
LNGX Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF | 21.25% | 5.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between DUKH and LNGX is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2025 | -0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DUKH vs. LNGX — Risk / Return Rank
DUKH
LNGX
DUKH vs. LNGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ocean Park High Income ETF (DUKH) and Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF (LNGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DUKH | LNGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.33 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DUKH | LNGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 2.15 | -1.29 |
Drawdowns
DUKH vs. LNGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DUKH drawdown since its inception was -5.70%, smaller than the maximum LNGX drawdown of -14.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUKH and LNGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DUKH | LNGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.70% | -14.31% | +8.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.81% | -10.78% | +9.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.13% | -4.41% | +3.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.87% | — | — |
Volatility
DUKH vs. LNGX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DUKH | LNGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.22% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.75% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.42% | 24.60% | -21.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.77% | 24.60% | -20.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.77% | 24.60% | -20.83% |
DUKH vs. LNGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DUKH has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than LNGX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
DUKH vs. LNGX - Dividend Comparison
DUKH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.13%, more than LNGX's 0.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DUKH Ocean Park High Income ETF | 6.13% | 6.12% | 2.77% |
LNGX Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF | 0.22% | 0.27% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DUKH and LNGX have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LNGX is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LNGX is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for DUKH.
DUKH has the higher dividend yield at 6.13%, compared with 0.22% for LNGX.
DUKH is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while LNGX is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Ocean Park and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for DUKH and 0.45% for LNGX.
Find the right allocation for DUKH and LNGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer