DUKE.L vs. SEDY.L
DUKE.L (Duke Royalty Ltd) is a stock, while SEDY.L (iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF) is Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD. Over the past 10 years, DUKE.L returned 1.74%/yr vs 6.10%/yr for SEDY.L. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DUKE.L vs. SEDY.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DUKE.L achieves a 5.47% return, which is significantly lower than SEDY.L's 10.15% return. Over the past 10 years, DUKE.L has underperformed SEDY.L with an annualized return of 1.74%, while SEDY.L has yielded a comparatively higher 6.10% annualized return.
DUKE.L
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 2.66%
- 6M
- 8.49%
- YTD
- 5.47%
- 1Y
- -3.82%
- 3Y*
- 1.50%
- 5Y*
- 1.14%
- 10Y*
- 1.74%
- ALL TIME*
- -18.10%
SEDY.L
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -0.53%
- 6M
- 5.42%
- YTD
- 10.15%
- 1Y
- 21.69%
- 3Y*
- 17.06%
- 5Y*
- 5.54%
- 10Y*
- 6.10%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.85%
DUKE.L vs. SEDY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DUKE.L Duke Royalty Ltd | 5.47% | -2.75% | 0.63% | 5.76% | -13.32% | 48.18% | -31.09% | 22.80% | 19.60% | -13.56% |
SEDY.L iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF | 10.15% | 18.70% | 8.71% | 13.01% | -22.64% | 12.65% | -5.85% | 10.44% | 0.25% | 14.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between DUKE.L and SEDY.L is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2012 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DUKE.L vs. SEDY.L — Risk / Return Rank
DUKE.L
SEDY.L
DUKE.L vs. SEDY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Duke Royalty Ltd (DUKE.L) and iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF (SEDY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DUKE.L | SEDY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.32 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.31 | 2.96 | -3.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.58 | 8.44 | -9.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DUKE.L vs. SEDY.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DUKE.L drawdown since its inception was -98.28%, which is greater than SEDY.L's maximum drawdown of -51.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUKE.L and SEDY.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DUKE.L | SEDY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.28% | -51.33% | -46.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.18% | -7.29% | -4.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.46% | -11.92% | -8.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.42% | -29.67% | -5.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.54% | -30.40% | -34.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.35% | -3.78% | -91.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -89.99% | -17.83% | -72.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.62% | 2.56% | +4.06% |
Volatility
DUKE.L vs. SEDY.L - Volatility Comparison
Duke Royalty Ltd (DUKE.L) has a higher volatility of 6.83% compared to iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF (SEDY.L) at 3.69%. This indicates that DUKE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEDY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DUKE.L | SEDY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.83% | 3.69% | +3.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.33% | 9.44% | +4.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.54% | 11.89% | +8.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.74% | 14.85% | +10.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.32% | 16.15% | +15.17% |
Dividends
DUKE.L vs. SEDY.L - Dividend Comparison
DUKE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.37%, more than SEDY.L's 5.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DUKE.L Duke Royalty Ltd | 10.37% | 10.37% | 9.15% | 8.42% | 8.18% | 5.26% | 4.00% | 6.00% | 6.43% | 4.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SEDY.L iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF | 5.08% | 5.72% | 7.74% | 7.99% | 9.32% | 6.42% | 5.11% | 5.84% | 5.54% | 4.07% | 4.25% | 6.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DUKE.L and SEDY.L have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for DUKE.L and SEDY.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer