PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DUKE.L vs. BIPS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DUKE.L vs. BIPS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Duke Royalty Ltd (DUKE.L) and Invesco Bond Income Plus Limited (BIPS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DUKE.L achieves a 4.50% return, which is significantly higher than BIPS.L's 3.02% return. Over the past 10 years, DUKE.L has underperformed BIPS.L with an annualized return of 1.65%, while BIPS.L has yielded a comparatively higher 5.45% annualized return.


DUKE.L

1D
0.00%
1M
1.71%
6M
5.47%
YTD
4.50%
1Y
-2.83%
3Y*
1.19%
5Y*
1.34%
10Y*
1.65%
ALL TIME*
-18.16%

BIPS.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.03%
6M
1.81%
YTD
3.02%
1Y
7.62%
3Y*
9.19%
5Y*
5.20%
10Y*
5.45%
ALL TIME*
6.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DUKE.L vs. BIPS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DUKE.L
Duke Royalty Ltd
4.50%-2.75%0.63%5.76%-13.32%48.18%-31.09%22.80%19.60%-13.56%
BIPS.L
Invesco Bond Income Plus Limited
3.02%8.04%8.84%10.52%-5.13%4.18%1.80%18.73%-7.60%9.93%

Correlation

The correlation between DUKE.L and BIPS.L is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2012

0.05

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DUKE.L:

£134.69M

BIPS.L:

£454.57M

EPS

DUKE.L:

£0.03

BIPS.L:

£0.24

PE Ratio

DUKE.L:

10.48

BIPS.L:

7.11

PEG Ratio

DUKE.L:

0.17

BIPS.L:

0.11

PS Ratio

DUKE.L:

3.12

BIPS.L:

5.90

PB Ratio

DUKE.L:

0.79

BIPS.L:

0.99

Total Revenue (TTM)

DUKE.L:

£43.66M

BIPS.L:

£68.76M

Gross Profit (TTM)

DUKE.L:

£34.79M

BIPS.L:

£59.59M

EBITDA (TTM)

DUKE.L:

£31.33M

BIPS.L:

£59.76M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DUKE.L vs. BIPS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DUKE.L
DUKE.L Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
DUKE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DUKE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
DUKE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
DUKE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
DUKE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

BIPS.L
BIPS.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
BIPS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIPS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIPS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
BIPS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIPS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DUKE.L vs. BIPS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Duke Royalty Ltd (DUKE.L) and Invesco Bond Income Plus Limited (BIPS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DUKE.LBIPS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.30

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.20

2.81

-3.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.34

10.31

-10.64

DUKE.L vs. BIPS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DUKE.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.14, which is lower than the BIPS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DUKE.L and BIPS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DUKE.L vs. BIPS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUKE.L drawdown since its inception was -98.28%, which is greater than BIPS.L's maximum drawdown of -50.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUKE.L and BIPS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DUKE.LBIPS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.28%

-50.42%

-47.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.88%

-2.70%

-11.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.46%

-4.72%

-15.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.42%

-23.39%

-12.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.54%

-38.38%

-26.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.39%

-0.26%

-95.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-89.99%

-5.19%

-84.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.62%

0.74%

+5.88%

Volatility

DUKE.L vs. BIPS.L - Volatility Comparison

Duke Royalty Ltd (DUKE.L) has a higher volatility of 6.77% compared to Invesco Bond Income Plus Limited (BIPS.L) at 1.66%. This indicates that DUKE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIPS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DUKE.LBIPS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.77%

1.66%

+5.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.44%

4.02%

+10.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.56%

5.18%

+15.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.73%

17.52%

+8.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.32%

19.09%

+12.23%

Dividends

DUKE.L vs. BIPS.L - Dividend Comparison

DUKE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.47%, more than BIPS.L's 7.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIPS.L
Invesco Bond Income Plus Limited
7.16%7.00%6.61%6.73%6.70%5.61%5.27%5.08%5.71%5.01%5.24%5.53%
DUKE.L
Duke Royalty Ltd
10.47%10.37%9.15%8.42%8.18%5.26%4.00%6.00%6.43%4.01%0.00%0.00%

Financials

DUKE.L vs. BIPS.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Duke Royalty Ltd and Invesco Bond Income Plus Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-30.00M-20.00M-10.00M0.0010.00M20.00M30.00M20222023202420252026
14.74M
20.39M
(DUKE.L) Total Revenue
(BIPS.L) Total Revenue
Values in GBP except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


DUKE.L and BIPS.L have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DUKE.L and BIPS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer