PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DUK vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DUK vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DUK achieves a 8.77% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 10.16% return. Over the past 10 years, DUK has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 8.62%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 67.95% annualized return.


DUK

1D
0.91%
1M
2.02%
YTD
8.77%
6M
10.57%
1Y
10.59%
3Y*
15.72%
5Y*
8.32%
10Y*
8.62%

NVDA

1D
0.16%
1M
-9.03%
YTD
10.16%
6M
17.38%
1Y
41.70%
3Y*
71.13%
5Y*
63.13%
10Y*
67.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DUK vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DUK
Duke Energy Corporation
8.77%12.72%15.56%-1.63%2.03%19.11%4.77%10.29%7.41%12.96%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
10.16%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%122.30%76.94%-30.82%81.99%

Correlation

The correlation between DUK and NVDA is -0.37, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 1999

0.08

The correlation between DUK and NVDA shifts across timeframes, from -0.37 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DUK:

$97.35B

NVDA:

$5.00T

EPS

DUK:

$6.61

NVDA:

$6.53

PE Ratio

DUK:

18.91

NVDA:

31.44

PEG Ratio

DUK:

1.48

NVDA:

0.17

PS Ratio

DUK:

2.92

NVDA:

19.80

PB Ratio

DUK:

1.82

NVDA:

25.60

Total Revenue (TTM)

DUK:

$33.29B

NVDA:

$253.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DUK:

$19.45B

NVDA:

$187.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

DUK:

$15.91B

NVDA:

$192.76B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DUK vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DUK
DUK Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
DUK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DUK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
DUK Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
DUK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
DUK Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DUK vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DUKNVDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.21

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.98

2.07

-1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.32

4.94

-2.62

DUK vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DUK Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DUK and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DUK vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUK drawdown since its inception was -71.92%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUK and NVDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DUKNVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.92%

-89.72%

+17.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.88%

-20.21%

+9.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.59%

-36.88%

+25.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.16%

-66.34%

+42.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.37%

-66.34%

+28.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.28%

-12.86%

+7.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.85%

-36.18%

+25.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.57%

8.46%

-3.89%

Volatility

DUK vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) is 5.62%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 13.26%. This indicates that DUK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DUKNVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.62%

13.26%

-7.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.13%

26.67%

-15.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.73%

35.00%

-20.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.84%

51.76%

-33.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.40%

49.84%

-29.44%

Dividends

DUK vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

DUK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, more than NVDA's 0.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DUK
Duke Energy Corporation
3.69%3.60%3.84%4.18%3.86%3.72%4.17%4.11%4.21%4.15%4.33%4.54%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.14%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%

Financials

DUK vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Duke Energy Corporation and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
9.18B
81.62B
(DUK) Total Revenue
(NVDA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

DUK vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Duke Energy Corporation and NVIDIA Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
67.9%
74.9%
Portfolio components
DUK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Duke Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 6.23B and revenue of 9.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.9%.

NVDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.

DUK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Duke Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 2.73B and revenue of 9.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.7%.

NVDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.

DUK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Duke Energy Corporation reported a net income of 1.55B and revenue of 9.18B, resulting in a net margin of 16.9%.

NVDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DUK and NVDA have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDA has higher volatility (13.26%) compared to DUK (5.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUK dropped -71.92% vs NVDA's -89.72%.

NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DUK and NVDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer