PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DUHP vs. ITOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DUHP vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DUHP achieves a 9.85% return, which is significantly lower than ITOT's 11.78% return.


DUHP

1D
0.73%
1M
5.98%
YTD
9.85%
6M
10.04%
1Y
21.20%
3Y*
19.70%
5Y*
10Y*

ITOT

1D
0.48%
1M
4.64%
YTD
11.78%
6M
11.52%
1Y
28.81%
3Y*
22.39%
5Y*
12.80%
10Y*
15.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DUHP vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DUHP
DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF
9.85%13.77%19.49%21.11%-2.56%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
11.78%17.00%23.80%26.12%-10.33%

Correlation

The correlation between DUHP and ITOT is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022

0.95

The correlation between DUHP and ITOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

DUHP vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DUHP
ITOT

Technology

34.0%
33.8%

Industrials

15.5%
9.5%

Healthcare

13.0%
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
10.1%

Financial Services

9.4%
12.1%

Consumer Defensive

7.9%
4.7%

Communication Services

6.7%
10.3%

Energy

2.3%
3.7%

Utilities

1.0%
2.3%

Basic Materials

0.6%
2.1%

Real Estate

-

2.4%

Technology

DUHP
34.0%
ITOT
33.8%

Industrials

DUHP
15.5%
ITOT
9.5%

Healthcare

DUHP
13.0%
ITOT
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

DUHP
9.5%
ITOT
10.1%

Financial Services

DUHP
9.4%
ITOT
12.1%

Consumer Defensive

DUHP
7.9%
ITOT
4.7%

Communication Services

DUHP
6.7%
ITOT
10.3%

Energy

DUHP
2.3%
ITOT
3.7%

Utilities

DUHP
1.0%
ITOT
2.3%

Basic Materials

DUHP
0.6%
ITOT
2.1%

Real Estate

DUHP

-

ITOT
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DUHP vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DUHP
DUHP Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
DUHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DUHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
DUHP Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
DUHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
DUHP Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

ITOT
ITOT Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
ITOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITOT Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
ITOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITOT Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DUHP vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DUHPITOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.43

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

3.25

-0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.36

14.92

-4.56

DUHP vs. ITOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DUHP Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the ITOT Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DUHP and ITOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DUHPITOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

2.37

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.57

+0.30

Drawdowns

DUHP vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUHP drawdown since its inception was -20.05%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUHP and ITOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DUHPITOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.05%

-55.20%

+35.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.99%

-8.90%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.86%

-19.44%

+1.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.25%

+0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.03%

-6.97%

+2.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

1.94%

+0.11%

Volatility

DUHP vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP) is 2.51%, while iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) has a volatility of 2.94%. This indicates that DUHP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ITOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DUHPITOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.51%

2.94%

-0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.66%

9.14%

-0.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.23%

12.19%

-0.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.23%

17.35%

-1.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.23%

18.26%

-2.03%

DUHP vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

DUHP has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DUHP vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison

DUHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, which matches ITOT's 0.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DUHP
DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF
0.97%1.02%1.13%1.51%1.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
0.97%1.11%1.23%1.47%1.66%1.18%1.41%1.88%2.14%1.69%1.83%2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, DUHP and ITOT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ITOT has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to DUHP (2.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUHP dropped -20.05% vs ITOT's -55.20%.

On 3-year performance, ITOT leads with 22.39% vs 19.70% for DUHP. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, DUHP has been the lower-risk option at 2.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, ITOT has performed better with a 22.39% return vs 19.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.21% for DUHP.

DUHP and ITOT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.97%.

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for DUHP and 0.03% for ITOT.

ITOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DUHP and ITOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer