PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DUHP vs. FCNTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DUHP vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DUHP vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DUHP
DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF
-2.48%13.77%19.49%21.11%-2.56%
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund Fund
-5.35%21.76%36.00%38.67%-16.35%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DUHP achieves a -2.48% return, which is significantly higher than FCNTX's -5.35% return.


DUHP

1D
0.63%
1M
-5.42%
YTD
-2.48%
6M
-2.37%
1Y
12.71%
3Y*
15.19%
5Y*
10Y*

FCNTX

1D
3.52%
1M
-5.86%
YTD
-5.35%
6M
-2.60%
1Y
19.23%
3Y*
24.91%
5Y*
13.21%
10Y*
16.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DUHP vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DUHP has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DUHP vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DUHP
DUHP Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
DUHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DUHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
DUHP Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
DUHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
DUHP Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

FCNTX
FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DUHP vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DUHPFCNTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.75

1.01

-0.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.18

1.56

-0.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.22

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.06

1.79

-0.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.88

6.87

-1.99

DUHP vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DUHP Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is comparable to the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DUHP and FCNTX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DUHPFCNTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

1.01

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.76

-0.05

Correlation

The correlation between DUHP and FCNTX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

DUHP vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

DUHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than FCNTX's 4.93% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DUHP
DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF
1.09%1.02%1.13%1.51%1.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund Fund
4.93%5.21%4.19%3.78%11.87%10.80%8.01%4.16%7.46%6.08%3.81%5.33%

Drawdowns

DUHP vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUHP drawdown since its inception was -20.05%, smaller than the maximum FCNTX drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUHP and FCNTX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DUHPFCNTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.05%

-49.19%

+29.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.07%

-11.30%

-0.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.04%

-8.18%

+2.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.16%

-8.18%

+4.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

2.95%

-0.32%

Volatility

DUHP vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP) is 5.11%, while Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX) has a volatility of 6.51%. This indicates that DUHP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DUHPFCNTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.11%

6.51%

-1.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.73%

11.12%

-2.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.10%

19.95%

-2.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.42%

19.19%

-2.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.42%

19.64%

-3.22%