PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DUHP vs. EBI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DUHP vs. EBI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP) and Longview Advantage ETF (EBI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DUHP achieves a 9.85% return, which is significantly lower than EBI's 14.86% return.


DUHP

1D
0.73%
1M
5.98%
YTD
9.85%
6M
10.04%
1Y
21.20%
3Y*
19.70%
5Y*
10Y*

EBI

1D
0.21%
1M
3.43%
YTD
14.86%
6M
15.24%
1Y
34.11%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DUHP vs. EBI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
DUHP
DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF
9.85%10.75%
EBI
Longview Advantage ETF
14.86%15.82%

Correlation

The correlation between DUHP and EBI is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2025

0.91

The correlation between DUHP and EBI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DUHP vs. EBI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DUHP
DUHP Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
DUHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DUHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
DUHP Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
DUHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
DUHP Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

EBI
EBI Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
EBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
EBI Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
EBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
EBI Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DUHP vs. EBI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP) and Longview Advantage ETF (EBI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DUHPEBIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.50

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

4.83

-2.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.36

19.92

-9.56

DUHP vs. EBI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DUHP Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is lower than the EBI Sharpe Ratio of 2.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DUHP and EBI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DUHPEBIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

2.83

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

1.42

-0.54

Drawdowns

DUHP vs. EBI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUHP drawdown since its inception was -20.05%, which is greater than EBI's maximum drawdown of -17.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUHP and EBI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DUHPEBIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.05%

-17.05%

-3.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.99%

-7.09%

-1.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.24%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.03%

-2.06%

-1.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

1.72%

+0.33%

Volatility

DUHP vs. EBI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP) is 2.51%, while Longview Advantage ETF (EBI) has a volatility of 2.85%. This indicates that DUHP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EBI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DUHPEBIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.51%

2.85%

-0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.66%

8.80%

-0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.23%

12.13%

-0.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.23%

17.93%

-1.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.23%

17.93%

-1.70%

DUHP vs. EBI - Expense Ratio Comparison

DUHP has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than EBI's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DUHP vs. EBI - Dividend Comparison

DUHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, more than EBI's 0.92% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
DUHP
DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF
0.97%1.02%1.13%1.51%1.10%
EBI
Longview Advantage ETF
0.92%1.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DUHP and EBI have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EBI has higher volatility (2.85%) compared to DUHP (2.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUHP dropped -20.05% vs EBI's -17.05%.

On 1-year performance, EBI leads with 34.11% vs 21.20% for DUHP. On fees, DUHP is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, DUHP has been the lower-risk option at 2.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EBI has performed better with a 34.11% return vs 21.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DUHP is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for EBI.

DUHP has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.92% for EBI.

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Longview. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for DUHP and 0.24% for EBI.

EBI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DUHP and EBI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer