DUHP vs. DIHP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DUHP (DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF) and DIHP (Dimensional International High Profitability ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DUHP is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while DIHP is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DUHP returned 17.83%/yr vs 14.14%/yr for DIHP. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DUHP charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for DIHP.

Performance

DUHP vs. DIHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP) and Dimensional International High Profitability ETF (DIHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DUHP achieves a 7.22% return, which is significantly higher than DIHP's 6.47% return.

DUHP

• 1D: -1.81%
• 1M: -0.02%
• YTD: 7.22%
• 6M: 6.35%
• 1Y: 18.29%
• 3Y*: 17.83%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DIHP

• 1D: -2.54%
• 1M: -1.40%
• YTD: 6.47%
• 6M: 5.91%
• 1Y: 18.13%
• 3Y*: 14.14%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DUHP vs. DIHP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
DUHP DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF	7.22%	13.77%	19.49%	21.11%	-6.61%
DIHP Dimensional International High Profitability ETF	6.47%	28.26%	0.50%	19.07%	-10.60%

Correlation

The correlation between DUHP and DIHP is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2022	0.77

The correlation between DUHP and DIHP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

DUHP vs. DIHP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DUHP	DIHP
Technology	36.7%	13.2%
Industrials	15.9%	22.5%
Healthcare	12.9%	11.5%
Consumer Cyclical	9.1%	10.7%
Financial Services	8.8%	9.3%
Consumer Defensive	7.4%	9.2%
Communication Services	5.3%	7.1%
Energy	2.1%	5.8%
Utilities	0.9%	2.7%
Basic Materials	0.6%	7.5%
Real Estate	-	0.4%

Return for Risk

DUHP vs. DIHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DUHP

DUHP Risk / Return Rank: 46
DUHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
DUHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
DUHP Omega Ratio Rank: 45
DUHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
DUHP Martin Ratio Rank: 53

DIHP

DIHP Risk / Return Rank: 37
DIHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
DIHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
DIHP Omega Ratio Rank: 37
DIHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
DIHP Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DUHP vs. DIHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP) and Dimensional International High Profitability ETF (DIHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DUHP	DIHP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.55	1.26	+0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.20	1.81	+0.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.23	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.04	1.67	+0.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.82	5.99	+2.83

DUHP vs. DIHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DUHP Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the DIHP Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DUHP and DIHP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DUHP vs. DIHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUHP drawdown since its inception was -20.05%, smaller than the maximum DIHP drawdown of -24.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUHP and DIHP.

Drawdown Indicators

	DUHP	DIHP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.05%	-24.94%	+4.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.99%	-10.92%	+1.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.86%	-12.42%	-5.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.47%	-4.17%	+1.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.00%	-4.82%	+0.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.08%	3.03%	-0.95%

Volatility

DUHP vs. DIHP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP) is 4.83%, while Dimensional International High Profitability ETF (DIHP) has a volatility of 5.29%. This indicates that DUHP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DUHP	DIHP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.83%	5.29%	-0.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.62%	12.24%	-2.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.87%	14.47%	-2.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.32%	16.33%	-0.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.32%	16.33%	-0.01%

DUHP vs. DIHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

DUHP has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than DIHP's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

DUHP vs. DIHP - Dividend Comparison

DUHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than DIHP's 2.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
DIHP Dimensional International High Profitability ETF	2.05%	2.02%	2.30%	2.17%	1.69%
DUHP DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF	0.99%	1.02%	1.13%	1.51%	1.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DUHP and DIHP in my portfolio?

DUHP and DIHP have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DUHP or DIHP?

DIHP has higher volatility (5.29%) compared to DUHP (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUHP dropped -20.05% vs DIHP's -24.94%.

Which ETF is better, DUHP or DIHP?

On 3-year performance, DUHP leads with 17.83% vs 14.14% for DIHP. On fees, DUHP is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, DUHP has been the lower-risk option at 4.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DUHP or DIHP?

Over the 3-year period, DUHP has performed better with a 17.83% return vs 14.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DUHP or DIHP?

DUHP is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for DIHP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DUHP or DIHP?

DIHP has the higher dividend yield at 2.05%, compared with 0.99% for DUHP.

What is the main difference between DUHP and DIHP?

DUHP is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DIHP is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for DUHP and 0.29% for DIHP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DUHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.