DUHP vs. DFAW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DUHP (DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF) and DFAW (Dimensional World Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DUHP is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while DFAW is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DUHP returned 20.36% vs 30.13% for DFAW. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DUHP charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for DFAW.

Performance

DUHP vs. DFAW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP) and Dimensional World Equity ETF (DFAW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DUHP achieves a 9.06% return, which is significantly lower than DFAW's 12.61% return.

DUHP

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: 6.00%
• YTD: 9.06%
• 6M: 9.28%
• 1Y: 20.36%
• 3Y*: 19.22%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DFAW

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: 4.36%
• YTD: 12.61%
• 6M: 13.91%
• 1Y: 30.13%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DUHP vs. DFAW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DUHP DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF	9.06%	13.77%	19.49%	12.04%
DFAW Dimensional World Equity ETF	12.61%	20.62%	15.49%	11.57%

Correlation

The correlation between DUHP and DFAW is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2023	0.91

The correlation between DUHP and DFAW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

DUHP vs. DFAW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DUHP	DFAW
Technology	34.0%	24.8%
Industrials	15.5%	13.6%
Healthcare	13.0%	7.9%
Consumer Cyclical	9.5%	10.2%
Financial Services	9.4%	15.5%
Consumer Defensive	7.9%	5.0%
Communication Services	6.7%	7.3%
Energy	2.3%	6.0%
Utilities	1.0%	2.3%
Basic Materials	0.6%	5.0%
Real Estate	-	2.4%

Return for Risk

DUHP vs. DFAW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DUHP

DUHP Risk / Return Rank: 52
DUHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
DUHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
DUHP Omega Ratio Rank: 51
DUHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
DUHP Martin Ratio Rank: 56

DFAW

DFAW Risk / Return Rank: 74
DFAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
DFAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
DFAW Omega Ratio Rank: 75
DFAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
DFAW Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DUHP vs. DFAW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP) and Dimensional World Equity ETF (DFAW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DUHP	DFAW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	2.52	-0.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.62	3.49	-0.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.46	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.28	3.41	-1.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.95	15.09	-5.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DUHP vs. DFAW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DUHP Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the DFAW Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DUHP and DFAW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DUHP	DFAW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.82	2.52	-0.69
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.87	1.62	-0.75

Drawdowns

DUHP vs. DFAW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUHP drawdown since its inception was -20.05%, which is greater than DFAW's maximum drawdown of -16.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUHP and DFAW.

Drawdown Indicators

	DUHP	DFAW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.05%	-16.93%	-3.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.99%	-8.88%	-0.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.86%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.41%	-0.70%	+0.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.04%	-1.70%	-2.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.05%	2.00%	+0.05%

Volatility

DUHP vs. DFAW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP) is 2.52%, while Dimensional World Equity ETF (DFAW) has a volatility of 3.35%. This indicates that DUHP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFAW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DUHP	DFAW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.52%	3.35%	-0.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.64%	9.39%	-0.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.24%	12.03%	-0.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.24%	14.46%	+1.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.24%	14.46%	+1.78%

DUHP vs. DFAW - Expense Ratio Comparison

DUHP has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than DFAW's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

DUHP vs. DFAW - Dividend Comparison

DUHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than DFAW's 1.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
DFAW Dimensional World Equity ETF	1.55%	1.71%	1.47%	0.42%	0.00%
DUHP DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF	0.97%	1.02%	1.13%	1.51%	1.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DUHP and DFAW in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, DUHP and DFAW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, DUHP or DFAW?

DFAW has higher volatility (3.35%) compared to DUHP (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUHP dropped -20.05% vs DFAW's -16.93%.

Which ETF is better, DUHP or DFAW?

On 1-year performance, DFAW leads with 30.13% vs 20.36% for DUHP. On fees, DUHP is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, DUHP has been the lower-risk option at 2.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DUHP or DFAW?

Over the 1-year period, DFAW has performed better with a 30.13% return vs 20.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DUHP or DFAW?

DUHP is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for DFAW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DUHP or DFAW?

DFAW has the higher dividend yield at 1.55%, compared with 0.97% for DUHP.

What is the main difference between DUHP and DFAW?

DUHP is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DFAW is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for DUHP and 0.25% for DFAW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFAW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.