DUHP vs. DFAS

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DUHP (DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF) and DFAS (Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DUHP is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while DFAS is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DUHP returned 17.83%/yr vs 15.91%/yr for DFAS. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DUHP charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for DFAS.

Performance

DUHP vs. DFAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP) and Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DUHP achieves a 7.22% return, which is significantly lower than DFAS's 14.69% return.

DUHP

• 1D: -1.81%
• 1M: -0.02%
• YTD: 7.22%
• 6M: 6.35%
• 1Y: 18.29%
• 3Y*: 17.83%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DFAS

• 1D: -0.91%
• 1M: 2.82%
• YTD: 14.69%
• 6M: 12.40%
• 1Y: 28.52%
• 3Y*: 15.91%
• 5Y*: 7.86%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DUHP vs. DFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
DUHP DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF	7.22%	13.77%	19.49%	21.11%	-0.03%
DFAS Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF	14.69%	8.17%	10.21%	17.83%	-4.06%

Correlation

The correlation between DUHP and DFAS is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022	0.84

The correlation between DUHP and DFAS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

DUHP vs. DFAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DUHP	DFAS
Technology	36.7%	15.1%
Industrials	15.9%	18.9%
Healthcare	12.9%	12.0%
Consumer Cyclical	9.1%	13.0%
Financial Services	8.8%	19.2%
Consumer Defensive	7.4%	4.2%
Communication Services	5.3%	2.6%
Energy	2.1%	6.4%
Utilities	0.9%	2.8%
Basic Materials	0.6%	5.2%
Real Estate	-	0.7%

Return for Risk

DUHP vs. DFAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DUHP

DUHP Risk / Return Rank: 46
DUHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
DUHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
DUHP Omega Ratio Rank: 45
DUHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
DUHP Martin Ratio Rank: 53

DFAS

DFAS Risk / Return Rank: 56
DFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
DFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
DFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 47
DFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
DFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DUHP vs. DFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP) and Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DUHP	DFAS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.55	1.69	-0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.20	2.49	-0.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.29	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.04	3.06	-1.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.82	10.51	-1.70

DUHP vs. DFAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DUHP Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the DFAS Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DUHP and DFAS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DUHP vs. DFAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUHP drawdown since its inception was -20.05%, smaller than the maximum DFAS drawdown of -26.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUHP and DFAS.

Drawdown Indicators

	DUHP	DFAS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.05%	-26.13%	+6.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.99%	-9.36%	+0.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.86%	-26.13%	+8.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.13%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.47%	-1.03%	-1.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.00%	-8.23%	+4.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.08%	2.72%	-0.64%

Volatility

DUHP vs. DFAS - Volatility Comparison

DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP) and Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS) have volatilities of 4.83% and 4.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DUHP	DFAS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.83%	4.84%	-0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.62%	11.96%	-2.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.87%	17.00%	-5.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.32%	20.81%	-4.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.32%	20.82%	-4.50%

DUHP vs. DFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DUHP has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than DFAS's 0.26% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

DUHP vs. DFAS - Dividend Comparison

DUHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, more than DFAS's 0.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DFAS Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF	0.91%	0.99%	0.93%	1.00%	1.03%	2.87%
DUHP DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF	0.99%	1.02%	1.13%	1.51%	1.10%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DUHP and DFAS in my portfolio?

DUHP and DFAS have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DUHP or DFAS?

DFAS has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to DUHP (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUHP dropped -20.05% vs DFAS's -26.13%.

Which ETF is better, DUHP or DFAS?

On 3-year performance, DUHP leads with 17.83% vs 15.91% for DFAS. On fees, DUHP is cheaper at 0.21% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DUHP or DFAS?

Over the 3-year period, DUHP has performed better with a 17.83% return vs 15.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DUHP or DFAS?

DUHP is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for DFAS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DUHP or DFAS?

DUHP has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.91% for DFAS.

What is the main difference between DUHP and DFAS?

DUHP is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DFAS is Small Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for DUHP and 0.26% for DFAS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.