DUG vs. XDSQ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DUG (ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas) and XDSQ (Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. DUG is passively managed, while XDSQ is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DUG returned -36.37%/yr vs 9.68%/yr for XDSQ. At a correlation of -0.30, they often move in opposite directions. DUG charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XDSQ.

Performance

DUG vs. XDSQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas (DUG) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DUG achieves a -36.75% return, which is significantly lower than XDSQ's 3.05% return.

DUG

• 1D: -1.25%
• 1M: 16.78%
• YTD: -36.75%
• 6M: -37.18%
• 1Y: -42.58%
• 3Y*: -26.36%
• 5Y*: -36.37%
• 10Y*: -31.35%

XDSQ

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 0.63%
• YTD: 3.05%
• 6M: 2.05%
• 1Y: 15.05%
• 3Y*: 14.47%
• 5Y*: 9.68%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DUG vs. XDSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DUG ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas	-36.75%	-18.63%	-6.13%	-2.28%	-72.98%	-40.48%
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF	3.05%	14.22%	23.12%	23.00%	-16.78%	13.28%

Correlation

The correlation between DUG and XDSQ is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.18
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2021	-0.30

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between DUG and XDSQ has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.30 to -0.01, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.

DUG vs. XDSQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DUG	XDSQ
Financial Services	33.3%	10.9%
Basic Materials	-	1.7%
Communication Services	-	10.7%
Consumer Cyclical	-	9.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.5%
Energy	-	3.1%
Healthcare	-	8.3%
Industrials	-	7.8%
Real Estate	-	1.8%
Technology	-	39.1%
Utilities	-	2.1%

Return for Risk

DUG vs. XDSQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DUG

DUG Risk / Return Rank: 2
DUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
DUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
DUG Omega Ratio Rank: 2
DUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
DUG Martin Ratio Rank: 2

XDSQ

XDSQ Risk / Return Rank: 43
XDSQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
XDSQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
XDSQ Omega Ratio Rank: 51
XDSQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
XDSQ Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DUG vs. XDSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas (DUG) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DUG	XDSQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.03	1.44	-2.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.59	1.99	-3.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.84	1.30	-0.47
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.75	1.58	-2.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.34	7.51	-8.85

DUG vs. XDSQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DUG Sharpe Ratio is -1.03, which is lower than the XDSQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DUG and XDSQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DUG vs. XDSQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUG drawdown since its inception was -99.92%, which is greater than XDSQ's maximum drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUG and XDSQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	DUG	XDSQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.92%	-26.06%	-73.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-57.00%	-9.60%	-47.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-68.64%	-19.15%	-49.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-94.03%	-26.06%	-67.97%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-99.46%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.90%	-0.03%	-99.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-88.98%	-4.91%	-84.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	31.81%	2.01%	+29.80%

Volatility

DUG vs. XDSQ - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas (DUG) has a higher volatility of 14.09% compared to Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ) at 0.62%. This indicates that DUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDSQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DUG	XDSQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.09%	0.62%	+13.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.47%	8.09%	+25.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.82%	10.50%	+31.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.52%	15.28%	+36.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	58.84%	15.02%	+43.82%

DUG vs. XDSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DUG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XDSQ's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

DUG vs. XDSQ - Dividend Comparison

DUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, while XDSQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DUG ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas	4.36%	3.21%	5.66%	4.16%	0.28%	0.00%	0.10%	0.56%	0.29%
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DUG and XDSQ in my portfolio?

DUG and XDSQ have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DUG or XDSQ?

DUG has higher volatility (14.09%) compared to XDSQ (0.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUG dropped -99.92% vs XDSQ's -26.06%.

Which ETF is better, DUG or XDSQ?

On 5-year performance, XDSQ leads with 9.68% vs -36.37% for DUG. On fees, XDSQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XDSQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DUG or XDSQ?

Over the 5-year period, XDSQ has performed better with a 9.68% return vs -36.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DUG or XDSQ?

XDSQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for DUG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DUG or XDSQ?

DUG has the higher dividend yield at 4.36%, compared with 0.00% for XDSQ.

What is the main difference between DUG and XDSQ?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for DUG and 0.79% for XDSQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XDSQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.