DUG vs. QTJL

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

DUG (ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas) and QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. DUG is passively managed, while QTJL is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DUG returned -40.27%/yr vs 9.73%/yr for QTJL. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions. DUG charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTJL.

Performance

DUG vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas (DUG) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DUG achieves a -42.53% return, which is significantly lower than QTJL's 4.13% return.

DUG

• 1D: -2.01%
• 1M: -7.41%
• 6M: -34.44%
• YTD: -42.53%
• 1Y: -47.75%
• 3Y*: -26.25%
• 5Y*: -40.27%
• 10Y*: -31.37%

QTJL

• 1D: -1.51%
• 1M: -2.95%
• 6M: 3.48%
• YTD: 4.13%
• 1Y: 13.53%
• 3Y*: 16.55%
• 5Y*: 9.73%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DUG vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DUG ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas	-42.53%	-18.63%	-6.13%	-2.28%	-72.98%	-21.05%
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July	4.13%	21.07%	16.50%	42.39%	-30.16%	9.36%

Correlation

The correlation between DUG and QTJL is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.07
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021	-0.19

The correlation between DUG and QTJL shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (all time) to 0.10 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DUG vs. QTJL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DUG	QTJL
Financial Services	40.4%	0.2%
Basic Materials	-	1.0%
Communication Services	-	14.5%
Consumer Cyclical	-	11.6%
Consumer Defensive	-	6.6%
Energy	-	0.5%
Healthcare	-	3.7%
Industrials	-	2.6%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Technology	-	58.0%
Utilities	-	1.2%

Return for Risk

DUG vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DUG

DUG Risk / Return Rank: 1
DUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
DUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
DUG Omega Ratio Rank: 1
DUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
DUG Martin Ratio Rank: 2

QTJL

QTJL Risk / Return Rank: 52
QTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
QTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
QTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 50
QTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
QTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DUG vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas (DUG) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DUG	QTJL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.14	1.28	-2.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.86	1.83	-3.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.81	1.26	-0.45
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.84	2.03	-2.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.41	10.11	-11.52

DUG vs. QTJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DUG Sharpe Ratio is -1.14, which is lower than the QTJL Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DUG and QTJL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DUG vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUG drawdown since its inception was -99.92%, which is greater than QTJL's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUG and QTJL.

Drawdown Indicators

	DUG	QTJL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.92%	-33.40%	-66.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-57.00%	-6.68%	-50.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-65.94%	-22.43%	-43.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-94.03%	-33.40%	-60.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-99.46%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.91%	-3.17%	-96.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-89.02%	-7.77%	-81.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	33.80%	1.34%	+32.46%

Volatility

DUG vs. QTJL - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas (DUG) has a higher volatility of 12.60% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) at 4.19%. This indicates that DUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DUG	QTJL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.60%	4.19%	+8.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.24%	8.42%	+24.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.96%	10.63%	+31.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.35%	20.34%	+31.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	58.80%	20.27%	+38.53%

DUG vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DUG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

DUG vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison

DUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%, while QTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DUG ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas	4.17%	3.21%	5.66%	4.16%	0.28%	0.00%	0.10%	0.56%	0.29%
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DUG and QTJL in my portfolio?

DUG and QTJL have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DUG or QTJL?

DUG has higher volatility (12.60%) compared to QTJL (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUG dropped -99.92% vs QTJL's -33.40%.

Which ETF is better, DUG or QTJL?

On 5-year performance, QTJL leads with 9.73% vs -40.27% for DUG. On fees, QTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTJL has been the lower-risk option at 4.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DUG or QTJL?

Over the 5-year period, QTJL has performed better with a 9.73% return vs -40.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DUG or QTJL?

QTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for DUG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DUG or QTJL?

DUG has the higher dividend yield at 4.17%, compared with 0.00% for QTJL.

What is the main difference between DUG and QTJL?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for DUG and 0.79% for QTJL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs -1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.