PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DUBS vs. PEPS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DUBS vs. PEPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS) and Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DUBS achieves a 13.77% return, which is significantly higher than PEPS's 11.42% return.


DUBS

1D
1.35%
1M
2.18%
6M
12.14%
YTD
13.77%
1Y
27.76%
3Y*
21.04%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
20.96%

PEPS

1D
0.80%
1M
1.61%
6M
8.66%
YTD
11.42%
1Y
25.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$881.48K$1.25M$931.41K
$4.87K$5.83K$15.17K

DUBS vs. PEPS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
DUBS
Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF
13.77%19.28%-1.36%
PEPS
Parametric Equity Plus ETF
11.42%20.32%-1.42%

Correlation

The correlation between DUBS and PEPS is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2024

0.97

The correlation between DUBS and PEPS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DUBS vs. PEPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DUBS
DUBS Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
DUBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DUBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
DUBS Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
DUBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
DUBS Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

PEPS
PEPS Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
PEPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEPS Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
PEPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEPS Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DUBS vs. PEPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS) and Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DUBSPEPSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.33

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

2.64

+0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.49

11.54

+2.95

DUBS vs. PEPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DUBS Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the PEPS Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DUBS and PEPS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DUBS vs. PEPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUBS drawdown since its inception was -18.48%, smaller than the maximum PEPS drawdown of -21.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUBS and PEPS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DUBSPEPSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.48%

-21.26%

+2.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.29%

-9.80%

+1.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.93%

-2.66%

+0.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

2.24%

-0.32%

Volatility

DUBS vs. PEPS - Volatility Comparison

Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS) and Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS) have volatilities of 3.96% and 3.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DUBSPEPSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.96%

3.92%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.83%

11.01%

-0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.81%

14.13%

-0.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.64%

18.09%

-3.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.64%

18.09%

-3.45%

DUBS vs. PEPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DUBS has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than PEPS's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

DUBS vs. PEPS - Dividend Comparison

DUBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, more than PEPS's 0.92% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
DUBS
Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF
1.97%2.06%2.52%1.14%
PEPS
Parametric Equity Plus ETF
0.92%1.00%0.17%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, DUBS and PEPS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DUBS has higher volatility (3.96%) compared to PEPS (3.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUBS dropped -18.48% vs PEPS's -21.26%.

On 1-year performance, DUBS leads with 27.76% vs 25.79% for PEPS. On fees, PEPS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DUBS has performed better with a 27.76% return vs 25.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PEPS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for DUBS.

DUBS has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 0.92% for PEPS.

They also come from different issuers: Aptus and Parametric. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for DUBS and 0.10% for PEPS.

DUBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DUBS and PEPS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer