PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DUBS vs. OMAH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DUBS vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DUBS achieves a 12.09% return, which is significantly higher than OMAH's 9.21% return.


DUBS

1D
-0.78%
1M
1.64%
6M
10.34%
YTD
12.09%
1Y
25.42%
3Y*
20.18%
5Y*
10Y*

OMAH

1D
0.53%
1M
2.66%
6M
9.10%
YTD
9.21%
1Y
13.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DUBS vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DUBS and OMAH is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2025

0.53

The correlation between DUBS and OMAH shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DUBS vs. OMAH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DUBS
OMAH

Technology

38.8%
11.6%

Financial Services

11.0%
37.3%

Communication Services

10.8%
19.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
4.1%

Healthcare

8.3%
4.4%

Industrials

7.9%
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
13.2%

Energy

3.2%
8.8%

Utilities

2.1%

-

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Basic Materials

1.7%

-

Technology

DUBS
38.8%
OMAH
11.6%

Financial Services

DUBS
11.0%
OMAH
37.3%

Communication Services

DUBS
10.8%
OMAH
19.8%

Consumer Cyclical

DUBS
10.0%
OMAH
4.1%

Healthcare

DUBS
8.3%
OMAH
4.4%

Industrials

DUBS
7.9%
OMAH
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

DUBS
4.5%
OMAH
13.2%

Energy

DUBS
3.2%
OMAH
8.8%

Utilities

DUBS
2.1%
OMAH

-

Real Estate

DUBS
1.8%
OMAH

-

Basic Materials

DUBS
1.7%
OMAH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DUBS vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DUBS
DUBS Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
DUBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DUBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
DUBS Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
DUBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
DUBS Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

OMAH
OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DUBS vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DUBSOMAHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.28

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

4.35

-1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.50

10.23

+3.27

DUBS vs. OMAH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DUBS Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the OMAH Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DUBS and OMAH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DUBS vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUBS drawdown since its inception was -18.48%, which is greater than OMAH's maximum drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUBS and OMAH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DUBSOMAHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.48%

-11.83%

-6.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.29%

-3.00%

-5.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.99%

0.00%

-0.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.95%

-1.25%

-0.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

1.27%

+0.62%

Volatility

DUBS vs. OMAH - Volatility Comparison

Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS) has a higher volatility of 4.22% compared to VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) at 2.75%. This indicates that DUBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OMAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DUBSOMAHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.22%

2.75%

+1.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.75%

5.73%

+5.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.54%

8.21%

+5.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.65%

12.92%

+1.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.65%

12.92%

+1.73%

DUBS vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison

DUBS has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

DUBS vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison

DUBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, less than OMAH's 14.94% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
DUBS
Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF
2.00%2.06%2.52%1.14%
OMAH
VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF
14.94%12.86%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DUBS and OMAH have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DUBS has higher volatility (4.22%) compared to OMAH (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUBS dropped -18.48% vs OMAH's -11.83%.

On 1-year performance, DUBS leads with 25.42% vs 13.01% for OMAH. On fees, DUBS is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, OMAH has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DUBS has performed better with a 25.42% return vs 13.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DUBS is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OMAH.

OMAH has the higher dividend yield at 14.94%, compared with 2.00% for DUBS.

They also come from different issuers: Aptus and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for DUBS and 0.95% for OMAH.

DUBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DUBS and OMAH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer