DUBS vs. OMAH
DUBS (Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DUBS returned 25.42% vs 13.01% for OMAH. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DUBS charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OMAH.
Performance
DUBS vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DUBS achieves a 12.09% return, which is significantly higher than OMAH's 9.21% return.
DUBS
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- 1.64%
- 6M
- 10.34%
- YTD
- 12.09%
- 1Y
- 25.42%
- 3Y*
- 20.18%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OMAH
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 2.66%
- 6M
- 9.10%
- YTD
- 9.21%
- 1Y
- 13.01%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DUBS vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DUBS Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF | 12.09% | 20.81% |
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF | 9.21% | 6.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between DUBS and OMAH is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2025 | 0.53 |
The correlation between DUBS and OMAH shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DUBS vs. OMAH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DUBS
OMAH
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
DUBS
OMAH
Financial Services
DUBS
OMAH
Communication Services
DUBS
OMAH
Consumer Cyclical
DUBS
OMAH
Healthcare
DUBS
OMAH
Industrials
DUBS
OMAH
Consumer Defensive
DUBS
OMAH
Energy
DUBS
OMAH
Utilities
DUBS
OMAH
-
Real Estate
DUBS
OMAH
-
Basic Materials
DUBS
OMAH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DUBS vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank
DUBS
OMAH
DUBS vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DUBS | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.28 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | 4.35 | -1.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.50 | 10.23 | +3.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DUBS vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DUBS drawdown since its inception was -18.48%, which is greater than OMAH's maximum drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUBS and OMAH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DUBS | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.48% | -11.83% | -6.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.29% | -3.00% | -5.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.99% | 0.00% | -0.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.95% | -1.25% | -0.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 1.27% | +0.62% |
Volatility
DUBS vs. OMAH - Volatility Comparison
Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS) has a higher volatility of 4.22% compared to VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) at 2.75%. This indicates that DUBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OMAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DUBS | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.22% | 2.75% | +1.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.75% | 5.73% | +5.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.54% | 8.21% | +5.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.65% | 12.92% | +1.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.65% | 12.92% | +1.73% |
DUBS vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison
DUBS has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
DUBS vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison
DUBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, less than OMAH's 14.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DUBS Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF | 2.00% | 2.06% | 2.52% | 1.14% |
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF | 14.94% | 12.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DUBS and OMAH have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DUBS has higher volatility (4.22%) compared to OMAH (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUBS dropped -18.48% vs OMAH's -11.83%.
On 1-year performance, DUBS leads with 25.42% vs 13.01% for OMAH. On fees, DUBS is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, OMAH has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DUBS has performed better with a 25.42% return vs 13.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DUBS is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OMAH.
OMAH has the higher dividend yield at 14.94%, compared with 2.00% for DUBS.
They also come from different issuers: Aptus and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for DUBS and 0.95% for OMAH.
DUBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DUBS and OMAH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer