PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DUBS vs. IDME
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DUBS vs. IDME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS) and Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (IDME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DUBS achieves a 13.77% return, which is significantly lower than IDME's 15.77% return.


DUBS

1D
1.35%
1M
2.18%
6M
12.14%
YTD
13.77%
1Y
27.76%
3Y*
21.04%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
20.96%

IDME

1D
0.49%
1M
0.49%
6M
8.88%
YTD
15.77%
1Y
30.76%
3Y*
16.93%
5Y*
6.08%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$881.48K$1.25M$931.41K
$938.24K$1.05M$895.28K

DUBS vs. IDME - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DUBS
Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF
13.77%19.28%24.08%7.89%
IDME
Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF
15.77%27.53%6.12%2.90%

Correlation

The correlation between DUBS and IDME is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2023

0.70

The correlation between DUBS and IDME has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

DUBS vs. IDME - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DUBS
IDME

Technology

38.4%
9.9%

Financial Services

11.5%
19.2%

Communication Services

9.9%
5.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
11.1%

Healthcare

8.9%
9.6%

Industrials

8.5%
13.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
8.4%

Energy

3.0%
5.6%

Utilities

2.2%
3.0%

Real Estate

1.8%
3.2%

Basic Materials

1.7%
8.1%

Technology

DUBS
38.4%
IDME
9.9%

Financial Services

DUBS
11.5%
IDME
19.2%

Communication Services

DUBS
9.9%
IDME
5.4%

Consumer Cyclical

DUBS
9.6%
IDME
11.1%

Healthcare

DUBS
8.9%
IDME
9.6%

Industrials

DUBS
8.5%
IDME
13.8%

Consumer Defensive

DUBS
4.5%
IDME
8.4%

Energy

DUBS
3.0%
IDME
5.6%

Utilities

DUBS
2.2%
IDME
3.0%

Real Estate

DUBS
1.8%
IDME
3.2%

Basic Materials

DUBS
1.7%
IDME
8.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DUBS vs. IDME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DUBS
DUBS Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
DUBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DUBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
DUBS Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
DUBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
DUBS Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

IDME
IDME Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
IDME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDME Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDME Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
IDME Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDME Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DUBS vs. IDME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS) and Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (IDME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DUBSIDMEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.34

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

2.70

+0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.49

10.35

+4.13

DUBS vs. IDME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DUBS Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the IDME Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DUBS and IDME, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DUBS vs. IDME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUBS drawdown since its inception was -18.48%, smaller than the maximum IDME drawdown of -29.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUBS and IDME.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DUBSIDMEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.48%

-29.20%

+10.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.29%

-11.46%

+3.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.48%

-12.88%

-5.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.47%

+1.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.93%

-10.87%

+8.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

2.98%

-1.06%

Volatility

DUBS vs. IDME - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS) is 3.96%, while Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (IDME) has a volatility of 4.85%. This indicates that DUBS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DUBSIDMEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.96%

4.85%

-0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.83%

14.52%

-3.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.81%

16.53%

-2.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.64%

14.84%

-0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.64%

14.81%

-0.17%

DUBS vs. IDME - Expense Ratio Comparison

DUBS has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than IDME's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

DUBS vs. IDME - Dividend Comparison

DUBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, less than IDME's 4.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DUBS
Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF
1.97%2.06%2.52%1.14%0.00%0.00%
IDME
Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF
4.57%4.90%5.64%3.71%2.62%1.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


DUBS and IDME have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDME has higher volatility (4.85%) compared to DUBS (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUBS dropped -18.48% vs IDME's -29.20%.

On 3-year performance, DUBS leads with 21.04% vs 16.93% for IDME. On fees, DUBS is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, DUBS has been the lower-risk option at 3.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DUBS has performed better with a 21.04% return vs 16.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DUBS is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IDME.

IDME has the higher dividend yield at 4.57%, compared with 1.97% for DUBS.

DUBS is categorized as Derivative Income, while IDME is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for DUBS and 0.65% for IDME.

DUBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DUBS and IDME

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer