PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DUBS vs. BLCR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DUBS vs. BLCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DUBS achieves a 13.00% return, which is significantly lower than BLCR's 18.88% return.


DUBS

1D
0.34%
1M
5.12%
YTD
13.00%
6M
13.09%
1Y
32.48%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BLCR

1D
-0.57%
1M
3.96%
YTD
18.88%
6M
20.88%
1Y
45.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DUBS vs. BLCR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DUBS
Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF
13.00%19.28%24.08%12.67%
BLCR
Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF
18.88%30.93%17.07%14.18%

Correlation

The correlation between DUBS and BLCR is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2023

0.90

The correlation between DUBS and BLCR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

DUBS vs. BLCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DUBS
BLCR

Technology

36.2%
35.7%

Financial Services

11.8%
12.1%

Communication Services

11.0%
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.9%

Healthcare

8.4%
7.6%

Industrials

8.2%
13.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%

-

Energy

3.5%
2.2%

Utilities

2.3%
1.6%

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%
2.2%

Technology

DUBS
36.2%
BLCR
35.7%

Financial Services

DUBS
11.8%
BLCR
12.1%

Communication Services

DUBS
11.0%
BLCR
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

DUBS
10.1%
BLCR
10.9%

Healthcare

DUBS
8.4%
BLCR
7.6%

Industrials

DUBS
8.2%
BLCR
13.5%

Consumer Defensive

DUBS
4.8%
BLCR

-

Energy

DUBS
3.5%
BLCR
2.2%

Utilities

DUBS
2.3%
BLCR
1.6%

Real Estate

DUBS
1.9%
BLCR

-

Basic Materials

DUBS
1.8%
BLCR
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DUBS vs. BLCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DUBS
DUBS Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
DUBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DUBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
DUBS Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
DUBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
DUBS Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

BLCR
BLCR Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
BLCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLCR Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
BLCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLCR Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DUBS vs. BLCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DUBSBLCRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.50

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.94

4.42

-0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.74

20.96

-2.22

DUBS vs. BLCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DUBS Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is comparable to the BLCR Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DUBS and BLCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DUBSBLCRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.57

2.92

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.53

1.88

-0.35

Drawdowns

DUBS vs. BLCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUBS drawdown since its inception was -18.48%, smaller than the maximum BLCR drawdown of -21.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUBS and BLCR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DUBSBLCRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.48%

-21.29%

+2.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.29%

-10.26%

+1.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-0.94%

+0.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.94%

-2.19%

+0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

2.16%

-0.42%

Volatility

DUBS vs. BLCR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS) is 2.69%, while Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR) has a volatility of 4.33%. This indicates that DUBS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DUBSBLCRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.69%

4.33%

-1.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.47%

12.26%

-2.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.72%

15.55%

-2.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.54%

17.46%

-2.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.54%

17.46%

-2.92%

DUBS vs. BLCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DUBS has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than BLCR's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

DUBS vs. BLCR - Dividend Comparison

DUBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, more than BLCR's 0.23% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BLCR
Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF
0.23%0.33%0.75%0.13%
DUBS
Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF
1.93%2.06%2.52%1.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


DUBS and BLCR have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BLCR has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to DUBS (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUBS dropped -18.48% vs BLCR's -21.29%.

On 1-year performance, BLCR leads with 45.16% vs 32.48% for DUBS. On fees, BLCR is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, DUBS has been the lower-risk option at 2.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BLCR has performed better with a 45.16% return vs 32.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BLCR is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for DUBS.

DUBS has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 0.23% for BLCR.

They also come from different issuers: Aptus and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for DUBS and 0.36% for BLCR.

BLCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 2.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DUBS and BLCR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer