DUBS vs. ARMW

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

DUBS (Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF) and ARMW (Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.56 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DUBS charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for ARMW.

Performance

DUBS vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DUBS achieves a 13.77% return, which is significantly lower than ARMW's 133.71% return.

DUBS

• 1D: 1.35%
• 1M: 2.18%
• 6M: 12.14%
• YTD: 13.77%
• 1Y: 27.76%
• 3Y*: 21.04%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 20.96%

ARMW

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: -28.93%
• 6M: 143.26%
• YTD: 133.71%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF	$3.40M	$4.54M	$4.17M
DUBS Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF	$881.48K	$1.25M	$931.41K

DUBS vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DUBS Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF	13.77%	3.01%
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF	133.71%	-41.28%

Correlation

The correlation between DUBS and ARMW is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025	0.56

DUBS vs. ARMW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DUBS	ARMW
Technology	38.4%	18.0%
Financial Services	11.5%	-
Communication Services	9.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	-
Healthcare	8.9%	-
Industrials	8.5%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	-
Energy	3.0%	-
Utilities	2.2%	-
Real Estate	1.8%	-
Basic Materials	1.7%	-

Return for Risk

DUBS vs. ARMW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DUBS

DUBS Risk / Return Rank: 83
DUBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
DUBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
DUBS Omega Ratio Rank: 81
DUBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
DUBS Martin Ratio Rank: 89

ARMW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DUBS vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DUBS	ARMW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.02	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.73	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.36	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.49	—	—

Drawdowns

DUBS vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUBS drawdown since its inception was -18.48%, smaller than the maximum ARMW drawdown of -56.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUBS and ARMW.

Drawdown Indicators

	DUBS	ARMW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.48%	-56.50%	+38.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.29%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.48%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-52.96%	+52.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.93%	-27.31%	+25.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.92%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DUBS	ARMW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.96%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.83%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.81%	95.78%	-81.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.64%	95.78%	-81.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.64%	95.78%	-81.14%

DUBS vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison

DUBS has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than ARMW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

DUBS vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison

DUBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, less than ARMW's 66.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF	66.19%	16.38%	0.00%	0.00%
DUBS Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF	1.97%	2.06%	2.52%	1.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DUBS and ARMW in my portfolio?

DUBS and ARMW have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DUBS or ARMW?

On fees, DUBS is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DUBS or ARMW?

DUBS is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for ARMW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DUBS or ARMW?

ARMW has the higher dividend yield at 66.19%, compared with 1.97% for DUBS.

What is the main difference between DUBS and ARMW?

They also come from different issuers: Aptus and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for DUBS and 0.99% for ARMW.