DTSVX vs. HFCGX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

DTSVX (Wilshire Small Company Value Portfolio) and HFCGX (Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, DTSVX returned 9.04%/yr vs 12.75%/yr for HFCGX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DTSVX charges 1.35%/yr vs 1.34%/yr for HFCGX.

Performance

DTSVX vs. HFCGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wilshire Small Company Value Portfolio (DTSVX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund (HFCGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DTSVX achieves a 16.01% return, which is significantly higher than HFCGX's 14.84% return. Over the past 10 years, DTSVX has underperformed HFCGX with an annualized return of 9.04%, while HFCGX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.75% annualized return.

DTSVX

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 1.21%
• YTD: 16.01%
• 6M: 18.23%
• 1Y: 38.00%
• 3Y*: 16.83%
• 5Y*: 8.11%
• 10Y*: 9.04%

HFCGX

• 1D: 1.16%
• 1M: 4.16%
• YTD: 14.84%
• 6M: 16.17%
• 1Y: 21.13%
• 3Y*: 24.56%
• 5Y*: 12.52%
• 10Y*: 12.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DTSVX vs. HFCGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DTSVX Wilshire Small Company Value Portfolio	16.01%	10.47%	7.63%	17.45%	-10.31%	32.04%	0.45%	21.31%	-16.42%	8.86%
HFCGX Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund	14.84%	4.78%	31.45%	19.58%	-4.97%	29.94%	17.73%	20.70%	-21.39%	16.60%

Correlation

The correlation between DTSVX and HFCGX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 1996	0.85

The correlation between DTSVX and HFCGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

DTSVX vs. HFCGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DTSVX

DTSVX Risk / Return Rank: 59
DTSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
DTSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
DTSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
DTSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
DTSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

HFCGX

HFCGX Risk / Return Rank: 41
HFCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
HFCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
HFCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 32
HFCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
HFCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DTSVX vs. HFCGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wilshire Small Company Value Portfolio (DTSVX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund (HFCGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DTSVX	HFCGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.10	1.73	+0.37
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.04	2.53	+0.51
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.30	+0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.87	2.92	+0.95
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.61	9.63	+2.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DTSVX vs. HFCGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DTSVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the HFCGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DTSVX and HFCGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DTSVX	HFCGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.10	1.73	+0.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38	0.52	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.39	0.50	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	0.39	-0.02

Drawdowns

DTSVX vs. HFCGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DTSVX drawdown since its inception was -62.29%, roughly equal to the maximum HFCGX drawdown of -62.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTSVX and HFCGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DTSVX	HFCGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.29%	-62.35%	+0.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.55%	-7.82%	-1.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.88%	-22.86%	-4.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.88%	-26.30%	-0.58%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.65%	-54.22%	+4.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.74%	0.00%	-0.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.30%	-15.23%	+4.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.93%	2.37%	+0.56%

Volatility

DTSVX vs. HFCGX - Volatility Comparison

Wilshire Small Company Value Portfolio (DTSVX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund (HFCGX) have volatilities of 4.47% and 4.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DTSVX	HFCGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.47%	4.38%	+0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.74%	9.39%	+2.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.02%	12.91%	+5.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.30%	24.07%	-2.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.42%	25.81%	-2.39%

DTSVX vs. HFCGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DTSVX has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than HFCGX's 1.34% expense ratio.

Dividends

DTSVX vs. HFCGX - Dividend Comparison

DTSVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.44%, while HFCGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DTSVX Wilshire Small Company Value Portfolio	9.44%	10.95%	9.03%	3.92%	11.16%	0.93%	2.30%	0.66%	6.28%	12.18%	2.20%	5.98%
HFCGX Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	14.11%	0.38%	3.58%	26.58%	0.00%	0.00%	10.47%	0.00%	0.00%	0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DTSVX and HFCGX in my portfolio?

DTSVX and HFCGX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DTSVX or HFCGX?

DTSVX has higher volatility (4.47%) compared to HFCGX (4.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DTSVX dropped -62.29% vs HFCGX's -62.35%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DTSVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.