DTRUY vs. R

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Daimler Truck Holding AG (DTRUY) and Ryder System, Inc. (R).

Performance

DTRUY vs. R - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Daimler Truck Holding AG (DTRUY) and Ryder System, Inc. (R). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DTRUY vs. R - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DTRUY Daimler Truck Holding AG	10.62%	21.94%	5.92%	30.45%	-14.50%	-9.55%
R Ryder System, Inc.	7.42%	24.53%	39.51%	41.61%	4.38%	-0.69%

Fundamentals

Market Cap DTRUY : $37.20B R : $8.35B
EPS DTRUY : $1.28 R : $12.02
PE Ratio DTRUY : 18.96 R : 17.03
PEG Ratio DTRUY : 27.10 R : 1.20
PS Ratio DTRUY : 0.80 R : 0.67
Total Revenue (TTM) DTRUY : $46.34B R : $12.67B
Gross Profit (TTM) DTRUY : $8.87B R : $3.30B
EBITDA (TTM) DTRUY : $4.11B R : $2.45B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DTRUY achieves a 10.62% return, which is significantly higher than R's 7.42% return.

DTRUY

• 1D: 4.25%
• 1M: -4.78%
• YTD: 10.62%
• 6M: 17.07%
• 1Y: 27.15%
• 3Y*: 19.30%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

R

• 1D: 4.01%
• 1M: -7.61%
• YTD: 7.42%
• 6M: 9.57%
• 1Y: 45.20%
• 3Y*: 34.98%
• 5Y*: 24.75%
• 10Y*: 15.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

DTRUY vs. R — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DTRUY

DTRUY Risk / Return Rank: 63
DTRUY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
DTRUY Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
DTRUY Omega Ratio Rank: 61
DTRUY Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
DTRUY Martin Ratio Rank: 60

R

R Risk / Return Rank: 80
R Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
R Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
R Omega Ratio Rank: 76
R Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
R Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DTRUY vs. R - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Daimler Truck Holding AG (DTRUY) and Ryder System, Inc. (R). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DTRUY	R	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.76	1.27	-0.52
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.40	1.81	-0.40
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.25	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.99	2.78	-1.79
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.99	7.15	-5.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DTRUY vs. R - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DTRUY Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is lower than the R Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DTRUY and R, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DTRUY	R	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76	1.27	-0.52
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.76	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.43	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.25	0.29	-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between DTRUY and R is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

DTRUY vs. R - Dividend Comparison

DTRUY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, more than R's 1.73% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DTRUY Daimler Truck Holding AG	4.46%	4.93%	5.37%	6.50%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
R Ryder System, Inc.	1.73%	1.80%	1.94%	2.31%	2.87%	2.77%	3.63%	4.05%	4.40%	2.14%	2.28%	2.75%

Drawdowns

DTRUY vs. R - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DTRUY drawdown since its inception was -45.11%, smaller than the maximum R drawdown of -74.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTRUY and R.

Drawdown Indicators

	DTRUY	R	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.11%	-74.02%	+28.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.71%	-17.52%	-8.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.97%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-72.26%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.65%	-8.64%	+0.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.97%	-22.58%	+5.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.71%	6.80%	+5.91%

Volatility

DTRUY vs. R - Volatility Comparison

Daimler Truck Holding AG (DTRUY) has a higher volatility of 12.58% compared to Ryder System, Inc. (R) at 11.74%. This indicates that DTRUY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than R based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DTRUY	R	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.58%	11.74%	+0.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.20%	26.31%	-4.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.11%	35.79%	+0.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.78%	32.88%	+2.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.78%	36.53%	-0.75%

Financials

DTRUY vs. R - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Daimler Truck Holding AG and Ryder System, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

DTRUY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Daimler Truck Holding AG reported a gross profit of 2.16B and revenue of 11.69B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.5%.

R - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ryder System, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.39B and revenue of 3.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.8%.

DTRUY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Daimler Truck Holding AG reported an operating income of 670.65M and revenue of 11.69B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.7%.

R - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ryder System, Inc. reported an operating income of -307.00M and revenue of 3.18B, resulting in an operating margin of -9.7%.

DTRUY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Daimler Truck Holding AG reported a net income of 484.41M and revenue of 11.69B, resulting in a net margin of 4.2%.

R - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ryder System, Inc. reported a net income of 133.00M and revenue of 3.18B, resulting in a net margin of 4.2%.